After her defeat by her ex-husband, Johnny Depp, in a long public trial followed by the whole world, which ended last June, and resulted in her being sentenced in favor of Depp to 10 million dollars in damages and 5 million punitive compensations, while she lost her audience and importance to the producers. Amber Heard refuses to give up or declare a loss, even partially admitting the mistake.

Here she is assigning her lawyer a new case, through which she is asking either to cancel the ruling against her, claiming that it was not supported by sufficient evidence, and that Deeb's defense only presented an implicit theory aimed at defaming her, or to hold the trial again.

4 weeks ago today Johnny Depp got the Justice he so thoroughly deserved!!

After 6 years of vilification, the jury found Amber Heard guilty of defamation.

They didn't believe her hoax!#JohnnyDeppGotJustice pic.twitter.com/439lDjUx9V

— Jen 🏴‍☠️ ⚔ 🏴‍☠️ (@No_Reason_Jenz) June 29, 2022

Excellent reasons or flimsy excuses?

Although the punitive damages issued against Heard has already been reduced from $5 million to just $350,000, the maximum punitive damages allowed by Virginia law, and although the jury awarded her $2 million in her counterclaim against Depp, that doesn't seem to be enough. for Heard.

Heard's legal team had based his lawsuit on a number of excellent reasons - as he put it - that would refute the validity of the procedures or the trial, and then the final court ruling itself.

Among them, there were some "inconsistencies", as described by CBS News;

As one of the members of the jury, specifically No. 15, stated in his submitted papers that he was born in 1945, while the information they have proves that he was born in 1970, and that makes him unfit to be accepted as a juror.

Amber Heard's Argument Attacking Juror #15.


Someone put the wrong year on the form.


1945 vs 1970.


New Trial?

pic.twitter.com/Qdj80A5ced

— Nate The Lawyer (@NatetheLawyer) July 2, 2022

On the other hand, the appellate body also claimed that the jury did not have enough evidence to prove the fact that star Johnny Depp lost movie roles as a result of the op-ed previously published by Heard in December 2018, in which she described herself as a public figure who was subjected to psychological and physical domestic violence. Which was the reason for the lawsuit that Deeb filed against her, accusing her of defamation, even though she never mentioned his name.

This is what Amber's lawyers justified by the fact that Johnny Depp was not officially asked to participate in the sixth part of the "Pirates of the Caribbean" series, as the hero and owner of the main character "Jack Sparrow", and therefore the judgment was based on assumptions, not facts.

A setback for all women

"A setback for all women";

This is how Heard described her feelings about the verdict against her, which neither the jury nor the vast majority of the public agree with, and this leads us to ask an inevitable question: Is Heard's crisis with the verdict against her mainly due to money and her inability to pay the compensation required of her, or is it really something? Still sees herself as a victim?

new charge

It is worth noting that a new accusation was brought against Heard a few days ago by the Australian authorities, stating that she violated Australia's strict quarantine and biosecurity laws, and forged travel documents in 2015, after she accompanied two dogs while visiting her husband in Australia while he was filming the fifth part of The series "Pirates of the Caribbean"?

The #FBI is assisting Australian officials in its investigation of actress #AmberHeard on claims she perjured herself during court proceedings when Heard smuggled her two dogs into the country in 2015. pic.twitter.com/sFmxU4VLNb

— Law&Crime Network (@LawCrimeNetwork) July 5, 2022

Although it was assumed that the case was closed in April 2016 after Heard had already admitted that she had falsified travel documents, the Australian Department of Agriculture, Water and Environment confirmed that the case remained.

The issue of Heard's lying under oath during court proceedings regarding her illegal entry of dogs into Australia is currently under investigation, especially as the authorities there fear that imported dogs may transmit diseases to animals in Australia, as they are considered one of the country's national wealth.

Actress #AmberHeard is still being investigated for allegations of perjury in Australia.

Heard is accused of bringing her dogs illegally to the country in 2015. pic.twitter.com/XX9AUfSUQI

— Law&Crime Network (@LawCrimeNetwork) July 1, 2022