The actual situation of the 'Sejong City Special Attack' trick... 116 ineligible winners just caught

<Anchor>

The Board of Audit and Inspection reviewed the status of special supply of apartments in Sejong for the past 11 years.

As a result, 116 cases of ineligible special supplies were discovered through tricks such as ineligibility, duplicate winnings, or forgery of documents.

Reporter Kim Min-jung reports.

<Reporter>

Sejong City's special supply was abolished in July last year as a controversy arose over the ghost office of the Customs Valuation and Classification Agency.

[Kim Bu-gyeom/Prime Minister at the time (May of last year, high-ranking party government council): I will accept the public reprimand that the special supply is rather preferential, and that there are cases of abuse of it.]

After that, the Board of Audit and Inspection for 11 years from 2010 We looked into the status of special supply in Sejong City of about 25,000 cases.

There were many different forms of trickery.

Geumsan-gun, Chungcheongnam-do was not the target of the special attack, but a member of the public official, Mr. A, won.

It was because I was dispatched to the Ministry of Public Administration and Security, the target of the relocation of Sejong City.

In order to confirm the special attack, I wrote the Ministry of Public Administration and Security instead of Geumsan-gun on the confirmation letter of the affiliated institution, and copied the official seal of the Minister of Public Administration and Security and even made a fake contract document.

Person A was charged with forgery of official documents.

Mr. B, who worked at the Small and Medium Business Promotion Agency, retired two years before the scheduled move-in date of the special apartment.

Of course he wasn't the target of a special attack, but the Korea Promotion Agency allowed it.

Like Mr. B, there were 28 public officials who were trying to buy a house to enter after retirement due to the special attack in Sejong City.

After receiving the special attack once, there were also six public officials who applied for a special attack and won again.

A total of 116 ineligible winners, two-thirds, or 76, were not filtered out in the subsequent confirmation stage, so they even signed an actual apartment contract.

The Board of Audit and Inspection pointed out the overall insolvency, saying, "The Happiness Agency does not have the authority to check whether the special attack is appropriate, and the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport has the authority but neglected the inspection."