NATO was born with confrontation genes. After the end of the Cold War, as the military and political organization with the largest military expenditure, the strongest weapons and equipment, and the most extensive military deployment in the world, NATO still adheres to the Cold War mentality and frequently provokes regional conflicts, disputes and conflicts. .

NATO has already messed up Europe, and tried to extend its black hand to Asia, becoming a troublemaker that undermines world and regional peace and stability.

  "Ukraine's membership in NATO is the brightest of all red lines for Russia," said William Burns, the current US CIA director and then US ambassador to Russia, in 2008.

  Although Russia's "red line" is clear, the United States and NATO have not stopped provocation.

  Under the leadership of the United States, NATO has expanded eastward five times since 1999, advancing more than 1,000 kilometers eastward to the Russian border.

  Under the intervention of NATO black hands led by the United States, in 2014, the so-called "Square Revolution" occurred in Ukraine, and the pro-Western government took power.

In February 2019, the Ukrainian parliament incorporated the membership of the European Union and NATO into the constitution as the country's basic policy.

This undoubtedly trampled on Russia's security "red line".

  After the outbreak of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, the United States not only did not seek to ease the crisis, but instead continued to provide various economic and military support to Ukraine, cheering for Ukraine and provoking Russia, which has led to the conflict continuing to this day.

Like almost all wars and conflicts that NATO is involved in, NATO has brought great disaster to the Ukrainian people by confronting Russia.

  Former U.S. Air Force Lieutenant Colonel Karen Kwiatkowski: Why do they want to destroy Ukraine, to prolong the war to destroy the people, the economy, the environment there?

Why are they willing to do this?

Because they want to weaken Russia.

I don't know if they want to weaken Russia temporarily or permanently, but that's their intention.

  In addition to creating a security crisis in Europe, NATO has already caused life and death in many countries in the Middle East.

According to incomplete statistics, the wars initiated and participated by NATO after 2001 alone resulted in the death of 900,000 people, including nearly 400,000 civilians. The most serious disasters occurred in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria and other countries, with a total of tens of millions counted refugee displacement.

These facts clearly show that NATO has never been a passive defense organization, but a crime-ridden war machine that is not governed by international law.

  Belarusian President Lukashenko: Libya, Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan and other countries, we all vividly remember the experiences of these countries.

Have they been rebuilt?

The so-called "democracy" under the wings of NATO warplanes leaves only pain and suffering for the people of those countries.

  At the same time, some western think tanks are clamoring for the establishment of a so-called "global NATO", and NATO is also frequently intervening in Asia-Pacific affairs, extending its black hand to the Asia-Pacific region.

  In April this year, NATO held a meeting of foreign ministers in Brussels, Belgium, to discuss NATO's new strategic vision.

In the name of "Global Partnership", the conference invited the foreign ministers of four Asia-Pacific countries, Japan, South Korea, Australia and New Zealand, to attend the conference for the first time.

On June 28, the NATO summit began in Madrid, Spain, with the participation of leaders from Japan, South Korea, Australia and New Zealand.

  This has aroused the vigilance of the Asia-Pacific public and political circles.

  South Koreans: Oppose participating in the NATO summit.

  Yoshiko Kira, a member of the Japanese Senate: Military alliances like NATO continue to incite armament expansion, which may eventually lead to war.

  Japanese political commentator Morita Minoru: Prime Minister Kishida is about to make a major mistake.

Why approach NATO?

As an Asian country, Japan should strive to promote peace in Asia, but it does the opposite. It is a very ignorant and dangerous behavior to be incited by the United States, Britain and other countries to approach NATO.

  Many netizens also expressed anger at this.

Some netizens pointed out that Asia is on the verge of the Pacific Ocean and has nothing to do with the North Atlantic Treaty Organization.

  "How did Asia appear in the North Atlantic? Do they understand geography?"

  "Asia wants to drive away the American demon, and wherever it goes, it will leave only death, destruction and suffering."

  "I think Asia is beautiful and wise without NATO. There is no doubt that Asian countries have lived through centuries of colonial rule in their past lives and will never be the puppets of the US and the UK."