In the clip above, you hear reactions to the verdict of the parties' lawyers.

- It is an incredible disappointment, I am surprised, almost shocked.

I do not agree with the district court, largely not a single point legally.

From a legal point of view, there is every reason to appeal against this judgment.

Of course, we will consider this carefully and we have until 8 July.

The absolute message this day is that this will be appealed, says Jan Södergren.

Lycksele District Court rejects the claims from Vapsten Lappby and orders the party to pay Vapsten Sami's legal costs of around SEK 3.5 million in addition to its own costs.

Vapsten Sami village's lawyer Per Magnusson is satisfied with the verdict and says that if the verdict is appealed by the other party, you have to deal with it then.

- We are happy and relieved that the court came to the verdict they made, so we are happy about it.

In addition to following our line when it comes to dismissing the claim, it is also very clear and the court has also taken many of our arguments, which is of course gratifying, they agree with us on how we have reasoned, the verdict is clear. , says Per Magnusson.

Sami Radio and SVT Sápmi's legal expert Eivind Torp thinks they are interesting.

- The provisions of the Reindeer Husbandry Act have been absolutely decisive for how the court has come to the conclusion that the Lapp village's claims are rejected, he says.

Javascript is disabled

Javascript must be turned on to play video

Read more about browser support

Sameradions & SVT Sápmi's legal expert Eivind Torp comments on them.

Photo: SVT