"Women's" bags lead an Asian to Dubai criminals

The Dubai Criminal Court issued a fine of 5000 dirhams against a 26-year-old Asian resident who, with the intention of selling, acquired a large number of counterfeit bags of a famous brand, causing losses to the agent concerned with selling the products of this brand, which prompted him to resort to the Dubai Police, who carried out a coordinated raid With the competent authorities, more than 104 counterfeit bags were seized.

The details of the incident revolve, as established in the conviction of the court and reassured it in its conscience about the receipt of information to the Department for Combating Economic Crimes in the General Department of Criminal Investigation and Investigation of the Dubai Police about the fact that the accused ran an apartment in a building in a commercial area, for the textile trade, and that he was in possession of a large amount of counterfeit products bearing the trademark. The famous "Gucci" was asked for permission from the Public Prosecution to raid the place and seize those goods, and the work team went to the apartment at a specific date, and seized 104 women's bags bearing the famous brand.

By questioning the accused, he admitted that he possessed the seized items with the intention of promoting them, and that they were counterfeit, and he bought them at a lower price from a person and did not have invoices for that. Then the state’s trademark owner’s agent submitted a request to initiate a criminal case against the accused, stating that he inflicted heavy losses on the company by trading in counterfeit goods.

Considering the case, the accused did not attend, and the Public Prosecution requested proceeding with the case, and the court decided to reserve it for judgment in absentia, and stated in its merits that the two crimes of possession of counterfeit goods with the intention of selling, and selling them, are inferred by mere possession of the counterfeit goods with the knowledge of their imitation, and this is what the trial court concluded from the facts presented. on her,

She explained that the certain evidence was established to prove the incident and its authenticity through the report of the victim company, the owner of the trademark through its agent, and the investigations of the Anti-Economic Crimes Department, and support for that by seizing counterfeit products and the accused’s confession to the inference record of free will that reassures the court, as well as reassured by the testimony of the accused. The owner of the trademark, then fined him 5000 dirhams and confiscated the counterfeit items.

Follow our latest local and sports news and the latest political and economic developments via Google news