When Olaf Scholz pithy proclaims that Russia will not win this war and has not achieved any of its goals, he almost gives the impression of a war chancellor on the commander's hill.
Like the other Western heads of government, he does not want to be a party to the war.
You see yourself completely on the side of Ukraine, but the promised heavy weapons are a long time coming.
There is no question that the chancellor must not agree to any measures that would harm Germany more than Russia.
But anyone who loudly calls for a multipolar world must create the conditions for it themselves.
Words and deeds diverge.
country against peace?
There may already be signs of a compromise with the "highly armed nuclear power" (Scholz).
Russia has suffered significant casualties, but has by no means lost its territorial conquests.
Even if, from a Western point of view, there can certainly be no “Russian dictated peace”, at least a ceasefire, which then establishes a status quo, cannot be ruled out.
country against peace?
That would reward the aggressor - but it would also be the result of an increasingly hesitant policy that once wanted to contain imperialism.
The Germans, most of whom still wanted the West to make preliminary disarmament efforts during the Cold War, now believe that our country must not allow itself to be blackmailed.
Although there are still strong reservations about NATO in eastern Germany, support for the alliance as a whole is at an all-time high.
Most firmly, Greens supporters believe that one must be prepared to defend one's country and freedom by any means necessary.
While the self-proclaimed patriots from the AfD can do little with it, the former party of the slackers has mutated into a stronghold of defensiveness.
However, in an emergency, the commitments must also be followed by deeds.