Vaccination or unemployed.
Ultimately, anyone who is affected by the facility-related vaccination requirement can face this alternative.
And yet - even this harsh measure in the fight against the corona pandemic, which due to summer temperatures, large crowds and the omission of many restrictions is subject to annual suppression, has stood the test before the Federal Constitutional Court.
This will not surprise many.
Some because they consider Karlsruhe to be a political bailiff anyway, especially in Corona times.
The others, because the decision is in an understandable series with others who saw essential measures up to the "federal emergency brake" as constitutional.
The consideration falls in order to protect particularly vulnerable people at the expense of those who absolutely do not want to be vaccinated.
They are still not forced;
but they must bear the consequences of their decision.
This is not a Karlsruhe harassment, rather the legislature is moving within a reasonable scope of assessment.
Of course, anyone who still believes that a vaccination does not protect, does not reduce the risk of infection and above all has a harmful effect has actually lost nothing professionally in the health system anyway.
But he should get help.