The penal code prohibits exposing minors to pornographic photos and videos, but the court criticizes the requesting associations e-Enfance and La Voix de l'enfant, whose requests had already been dismissed in October, for not having "acted, nor attempted to act” against the nine sites targeted, and this while their owners or publishing companies are identifiable and communicate an address located in the European Union, she explained in a judgment consulted by AFP.
However, blocking by Internet access providers can only occur as a last resort, after the applicants have demonstrated "the impossibility of acting effectively and quickly against the host, against the publisher or against the author disputed content".
Several of the sites concerned are video hosting platforms which appear among the 50 most popular sites in France, according to a ranking established by the analysis company Similarweb.
Seven of them are in a parallel procedure, summoned by Arcom (ex-CSA) to block their access by minors.
Since the law of July 30, 2020 on domestic violence and the publication in the fall of an implementing decree, the media regulator can indeed give notice to pornographic sites to take measures to prohibit their access to minors, and failing that, turn to the president of the Paris court to order their blocking.
This same law specifies that the companies concerned cannot exonerate themselves from their responsibilities by contenting themselves with asking an Internet user if he is of legal age.
Arcom launched a first salvo of formal notices at the end of December and announced on March 8 that it had taken legal action to request the blocking of the Pornhub, Pornhub, Xhamster, Xvideos and Xnxx sites.
A hearing is scheduled for May 24 in this procedure in Paris.
Two other sites, YouPorn and Redtube, were also given formal notice in April by Arcom to prevent their access to minors.
© 2022 AFP