<Anchor>



Yesterday (27th), the people's power, which filed an application for injunction to the Constitutional Court to stop the plenary session of the bill, urged us to draw a conclusion quickly.

The Democratic Party slammed the application for injunction itself, calling it an unconstitutional attempt.



This is reporter Eom Min-jae's report.



<Reporter>



Ahead of the plenary session of the National Assembly for the bill to be passed over and over, lawmakers from the People's Power have put pressure on the Constitutional Court.



The Constitutional Court urged the Constitutional Court to promptly accept the application for an injunction to stop the resolution of the agenda conciliation committee, which was concluded with Rep. Min Hyung-bae's disguised departure from the party, and the proposal to the plenary session is a violation of the voting right of lawmakers.



[Yoo Sang-beom / Rep. of People's Power: If the legislative purpose of 'check-and-run' is justified, the legislative process must also be just.

I strongly urge the Constitutional Court to make a fair and quick decision.]



The Democratic Party criticized this movement of people's power as an anti-constitutional attempt and emphasized the handling of the National Assembly as scheduled.



[Park Hong-geun / Democratic Party floor leader: (application for injunction) is an anti-constitutional attempt that negates the existence of the legislative branch itself.

The National Assembly, representing the sovereign people, has transferred the legislative power specified in the Constitution to the non-elected judiciary.]



The Constitutional Court, which took over the ball, said that the preliminary procedure for issuing a disposition was not complete.



An official from the Constitutional Court said, "Only a two-page injunction application was submitted from the People's Power side, but for the court to decide, the type of claim must be decided."



The People's Power said that the time was urgent, and the provisional disposition was first issued, and that it was preparing to receive the original case.



To the point that there is absolutely no physical time to judge the injunction, he countered that even if the amendment to the Prosecutor's Office Act was not made the day after, it would have to be done by May 2, the day before the revision of the Criminal Procedure Act, another axis.



(Video coverage: Yang Doo-won, video editing: Park Jeong-sam)