Four terrorist attacks in two weeks: In Beer Sheva, a terrorist stabbed four people in front of a shopping center.

Terrorists killed two people in Hadera.

In Bnei Brak, a terrorist shot dead five passersby from a motorcycle.

A terrorist killed three people outside a bar in Tel Aviv.

And again there were pictures of hooded men handing out sweets to celebrate the attack in Ramallah.

On tageschau.de one could read: "According to the police, a 'terrorist' opened fire." Terrorist, at least, but in quotation marks.

Who else but a terrorist commits a terrorist attack?

The BR ran the headline "Bar shootout in Tel Aviv: Suspected perpetrator shot dead".

Bar shootout, that sounds like a fight in a western.

“Guardian” and Reuters also had “interesting” titles to offer: “Israeli forces kill Palestinian after Tel Aviv shooting leaves two dead” and: “Israeli forces shoot dead Palestinian after Tel Aviv bar attack”.

It sounds as if the security forces shot and killed a Palestinian in cold blood indiscriminately on the street.

And does not say that the terrorist fought another skirmish with the security forces and was shot in the process.

You would have to read the report in full for that.

Negligent on the issue of Israel-Palestine

Is that sloppiness?

Can that happen, even if it's negligent on the subject of Israel-Palestine, on which everyone has an opinion but hardly anyone has a clue and some have an anti-Semitic half-knowledge?

Or do these headlines use the well-known template of the aggressor Israel and the poor victim Palestine - and what doesn't fit is made to fit?

There is even the handy 3-D test, a good indicator of whether the criticism is justified or whether it is anti-Semitism related to Israel: demonization, double standard, delegitimization.

Palestinians, by the way, only seem to be of interest when it comes to Israel.

Or can you remember solidarity rallies when the Assad regime surrounded the Palestinian refugee camp Yarmouk in 2013, starved 18,000 people, including 3,500 children, and threw barrel bombs at them, until Yarmouk was nicknamed "hell on earth"?

Also easily forgotten: the situation of the Palestinians in Lebanon.

Palestinians are still considered stateless there.

Even if the great-grandfather came to Lebanon in 1948, his refugee status is passed down from father to son, grandson and great-grandson.

You are not allowed to work as a doctor, engineer, lawyer, hairdresser or taxi driver.

Palestine refugees are held in lawless limbo

They are left with poorly paid jobs, which the Lebanese do not want, in construction and agriculture.

The alternative is undeclared work.

Palestinians are not allowed to buy land in Lebanon and are only allowed to live in the refugee camps of UNRWA, the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Middle East.

There are many reasons why they are being held in this lawless limbo.

The Palestinians are cared for in Lebanon by UNRWA.

Both UNRWA and Lebanon are using the Palestinians' refugee status to insist on the "right of return" enshrined in the UN Human Rights Charter.

A return is more than unlikely in the current situation.

This confinement of the Palestinians also secures cheap labor for Lebanon.

Anti-Semitism is a state doctrine in both Syria and Iran.

These states are concerned with hating Jews, not with the Palestinians, even if they repeatedly present themselves as their protecting power.

This has not prevented Assad from massacring the Palestinians in Yarmouk, nor has it persuaded Iran and its little Lebanese sister Hizbullah to campaign for Palestinian work permits, for example.

Things are no better for the art and culture anti-Semites from the BDS.

Here, too, there is little interest in the Palestinians in Yarmouk and Burj Barajneh.

Even UNRWA, created specifically to alleviate the plight of the Palestinians, often stands in the way of their integration into surrounding states.

She is also known for her anti-Semitic textbooks and allowed

Germany supports UNRWA

During her trip to the Middle East in February, Annalena Baerbock said: "Israel's security is and will remain a matter of state."

Conditions have not been mentioned so far.

Back to the terrorist attacks.

They are usually booked as part of the Middle East conflict.

The Hadera terrorists claimed allegiance to IS.

However, conflicts involve different parties representing different interests, sometimes violently.

However, some of what is interpreted as a conflict is actually a will to annihilate.

The aim of the attacks on civilians is to kill as many Jews as possible.

This is not a conflict, this is anti-Semitic terror.

Incidentally, the media houses mentioned above have corrected their headlines again.

Good this way.