It was after the board examined ten different disciplinary cases against the Örebro lawyer that the decision to suspend the man was made.

The motivation was, among other things, that the shortcomings in his activities have seriously come to "jeopardize the lawyer's core values", the board concluded.

Now the lawyer chooses to appeal the exclusion to the Supreme Court (HD) and proposes that the sentence be changed to a warning plus a penalty.

In addition, the lawyer wants HD to advocate that the exclusion decision should be inhibited, or paused, until his case has been tried in court.

Stopped by the district court

Örebro District Court stopped the lawyer from acting as a defender after he stated incorrectly the number of hours for the work he put in and also must have shown incompetence and incomprehension.

However, the Örebro District Court's decision was remitted by the Court of Appeal with reference to the fact that it was taken "

without first giving the lawyer the opportunity to comment on the issue or on the material on which the decision was based

."