Activists on social media circulated videos of Hindu demonstrations besieging a mosque in the Indian state of Karnataka, while social networking sites erupted in refusal to release an application designer selling Indian Muslim women.

Indian journalist Irshad Muhammad stated - through his account on Twitter - that the demonstration was a political march by the right-wing politician and Indian Member of Parliament Tejas in Syria, and was supposed to march from the city of Bangalore to the city of Koller in Karnataka state.

When the march reached the vicinity of the "Hussein Makan" mosque in the city of Koller, the participants - as shown in the videos - began creating chaos, shouting, and even dancing and singing around the mosque.

Commenting on the incident, activist Amina Kawthar attacked the Indian parliamentarian Tejas in Syria, saying that "wherever he goes he spreads Islamophobia," adding that "this is how the majority of the right-wing Hindutva movement deals with minorities and their places of worship in India."

Tejasvi Surya had organized a cycle rally from Bangalore to Kolar on March 21. When the rally reached the Hussaini Makan Masjid of Kolar the people who participated in the rally stopped and started doing this nuisance.

What is the message?

pic.twitter.com/9UwiZlGbEm

— Mohammed Irshad H (@Shaad_Bajpe) March 29, 2022

Release the designer of an application to sell Muslim women

In the same context, the Indian communication platforms were abuzz after the release of the designer of the "Sulli Deals" application, which was dedicated to displaying pictures of Muslim personalities and girls for sale, after he was arrested several months ago.

And the Indian media reported statements from officials of the Indian state court of Delhi - which released him on bail the day before yesterday - Monday - confirming that the reason for his release is that he "committed the crime for the first time", as well as that he will remain under investigation and await trial soon.

Bail is granted to #BulliBai and #SulliDeals App creators on humanitarian grounds.

Aren't those women auctioned online human too?

Why does justice turns out to be selective when it comes to women and others who have been in jail for years without proper trials?#HateCrime pic.twitter.com/TptjGWEu4C

— Congress Kerala (@INCKerala) March 29, 2022

The opposition Indian National Congress criticized the court's decision, and said that what happened was unfair because the app's owner committed a crime against Indian women.

The party described what happened as a kind of "selective justice", noting that there are other people who spent dozens of years in prison without trial and were not released.

Student activist Naveed Sheikh also criticized what he described as "double standards" in the Indian judiciary, saying, "Those who raise their voices against the wrong policies of the government, and those who raise their voices for justice, are imprisoned and do not even get bail; but those who auction Muslim women through Electronic applications get the guarantee.

For his part, activist Muhammad Mahboob asked, "Why aren't Muslim activists arrested for demonstrating and objecting to the policies of the Indian government, such as Atiq Rahman and Raouf Sharif, on humanitarian grounds, as happened with the designer of the app that insults Muslim women?"