Since the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, the United States has launched sanctions and condemnations against Russia around the world, and has asked other countries in the world to do the same. history).

　　Surprisingly, India, an important partner of the US "Indo-Pacific strategy", has also been assigned this label.

Since the outbreak of the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, India has always refused to follow US sanctions and blamed Russia for causing US dissatisfaction.

　　According to the British "Independent" report, on March 16, US White House Press Secretary Jane Psaki warned at a press conference that India was unwilling to follow the US sanctions policy, saying that although India's purchase of oil from Russia did not violate the US's Sanctions, but the move would put India (the so-called "world's largest democratic state" in the West) "on the wrong side of history."

　　On February 27, in a program on the Indian news channel "Republic World" (Republic World), Indian host Anabu and Georgetown University professor Charles A. Kupkan had a discussion on India's position. Intense "quarrel".

　　On the show, Kupkan criticized India for "can't be a 'wall-rider' anymore", but Anabu responded with "don't educate us" and angered that "the United States is not qualified to pretend to be a defender of democracy and human rights."

　　When Kupkan said, "You see that the Western countries have united against Russia, and two-thirds of the countries are against Russia", the Indian host Anabu shook his head and said "no", he couldn't help it Tried to chime in, but couldn't.

　　After Kupkan finished his speech, Anab said first: "I hope you can let me finish my words with dignity."

　　"First of all, with all due respect, Professor Kupkan, your statement does not stand on a moral standpoint! You Americans are not qualified, and the United States is not qualified to pretend to be the defenders of democracy and human rights. You are the culprits of atrocities. "The host Anabu yelled loudly.

　　He immediately mentioned that Obama and his allies disrupted the situation in the Libyan civil war, which lasted for ten years. He also cited the United States launched wars against many countries, including Iraq, Syria, Yemen, Somalia, and Niger, and killed them with drones. Thousands.

　　"When you talk about India, we are a big country, we are not your 'satellite country', so don't teach us what to do. We will take care of ourselves," the host said to Kupkan.

　　On March 21, the program debated the US remarks that "India is on the wrong side of history".

Professor Kupkan challenged the nerves of the Indian media once again.

　　In this program, the host Anab believes that on the Ukraine issue, India's foreign policy is independent and neutral.

He said it was necessary for some key countries to remain neutral in the face of this crisis.

　　In his response, Professor Kupkan claimed that India is choosing sides.

And asked the Indian side, when Ukraine is in deep crisis, where is India?

India to decide whether they are on the right or wrong side of history?

Why doesn't India stand up to "condemn" Russia?

　　At this time, the host Anabu first asked a question: "Why doesn't the United States say the same thing to China?" Then he threw the question to an Indian guest on the far left.

　　In fact, Anabo's question has already been answered.

In early March, US Secretary of State Blinken said in an interview with NPR that China had been on the "wrong side of history" on the Ukraine issue.

　　In response, the Indian guest said that in fact, there are many countries that have been included in the "wrong side of history" by the United States, including Germany, Denmark, and even Japan, and Japanese companies are unwilling to obey the sanctions of the United States and stop buying Russian oil. .

　　He pointed out that in fact the United States has a history of putting other countries at great expense to defend so-called democracy when they feel small to themselves, essentially defending the White House.

He pointed to U.S.-initiated sanctions that forced Germany to buy gas from Russia at higher prices.

　　The Indian guest also asked the United States, some European countries are also buying Russian oil and gas, why the White House press secretary Psaki only said that India is on the "wrong side of history".

　　Regarding China's position, on March 25, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Wang Wenbin once again made a clear statement at a regular press conference.

　　Wang Wenbin said: "On the Ukraine issue, China has always proceeded from the right and wrong of the matter itself, and made efforts to ease the situation, resolve the crisis, and rebuild peace. We have always maintained that there should be no double standards in handling international relations. Ukraine's sovereignty and security should be guaranteed. Russia's legitimate security concerns should also be respected. We cannot claim to oppose war while waging war everywhere; claiming to maintain peace and wantonly destroying peace at the same time. China's position is consistent with the aspirations of most countries. We oppose targeting China's groundless accusations and suspicions, let alone any pressure or coercion. Time will prove that China's claim is on the right side of history."

　　The United States and some Western countries call themselves "history teachers" and arbitrarily define who is on the "right side of history". This practice has also been strongly countered by Chen Weihua, the EU bureau chief of China Daily.

　　On March 24, Finnish Prime Minister Sauna Marin said in an interview at the EU Council summit that in the situation between Russia and Ukraine, "we need to know whether China is on the right side of history".

　　In this regard, Chen Weihua, director of the EU bureau of China Daily, gave a clear and positive answer on his Twitter, and pointed out that "China opposes the Iraq war, but Finland does not."

　　Chen Weihua then sent two tweets in a row asking Western countries, when the United States launched the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, when the United States used drones to attack sovereign countries, did these countries stand on the "right side of history"?

　　Chen Weihua pointed out the double standard of the so-called "right side of history" in his tweet.

Those who accuse China of being on the wrong side of history have no idea what they are talking about, he said.

When China opposes and condemns the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, regime change in Libya, drone strikes against sovereign states, and the embargo on Cuba, China is really on what they call the "wrong" side.

　　Those who accuse China should look at their country on these issues, are they on the right side, or are they on the criminal side, engaging in those wars, regime changes and bombings?

Facts are facts.

History will remember.