Abu Dhabi Court rejected the case

Woman asks court to compel her friend's husband to pay off her car loan

The Abu Dhabi Court for Family and Civil and Administrative Claims rejected a woman’s lawsuit, demanding her friend’s husband pay 122,000 dirhams, the value of a car loan that the woman obtained for the benefit of her friend’s husband, and refused to commit to paying the installments. The court rejected the lawsuit and obligated the plaintiff to pay fees and expenses.

In the details, a woman filed a lawsuit against her friend’s husband, demanding that he pay her 122,000 dirhams and the legal interest at 9% from the date of filing the lawsuit until full payment, and obligating him to register a Nissan car, and pay all traffic violations while obligating him to pay fees and expenses, noting that And by virtue of the friendship relationship with the defendant’s wife, as well as the friendship between her husband and the defendant, and in view of the latter’s financial circumstances, she was asked to purchase a vehicle through the bank, with the obligation to pay the monthly installments, which prompted her to purchase the vehicle for the defendant through a bank, but he failed to pay installments and did not comply with that.

During the consideration of the case, the woman did not attend and the defendant did not attend, and the court stated that the burden of proof rests on the plaintiff and that he is legally charged with proving his claim and providing evidence that confirms what he claims, and that the trial court is not obligated to assign the opponent to provide evidence for his defense or to draw his attention to the requirements of this defense .

The court confirmed in the ruling’s merits that what was established in the papers is that the woman obtained a Nissan car Murabaha for the amount of 122,000 dirhams, and did not provide evidence that she had delivered this car to the defendant, and the papers were devoid of any evidence that the defendant asked her to take a vehicle Murabaha And she grants it to him on condition that he pays the monthly installments. The plaintiff’s statements in this regard were sent without evidence. The plaintiff did not request that the case be referred for investigation to prove her claim in any way of proof. Thus, the case lacked evidence to prove its validity, which is why the case was based on something other than Deed of fact and law, and the court ruled to reject the case and obligated the plaintiff to pay fees and expenses.

Follow our latest local and sports news and the latest political and economic developments via Google news