He impersonated a car company manager and stole its money

A fraudster deceives a woman and seizes half a million dirhams

The court ordered the accused to pay 509,000 dirhams in compensation to the woman.

archival

The Abu Dhabi Court for Family and Civil and Administrative Cases ruled that a man “imprisoned in a fraud crime” must pay a woman an amount of 509,500 dirhams, with the fees and expenses of the case, on the grounds that the accused misleads the plaintiff to work as a manager of a car company, defrauding her and obtaining her money without right face.

The details of the case relate to a woman filing a lawsuit demanding that a fraudster pay an amount of 500,000 dirhams, compensation in the amount of 200,000 dirhams, and oblige him to pay fees and expenses, noting that he claimed that he was a manager in a car company and would provide her with a vehicle, which called her to hand him an amount of 500,000 dirhams. Later, he defrauded her and seized the amount, and was convicted of a final and final penal verdict, fined 50 thousand dirhams and deported from the state.

During the consideration of the case, the plaintiff attended, and the defendant was brought from his prison, and requested to reject the case for lack of validity and proof, and to oblige the plaintiff to pay the fees and expenses of the case, while the court stated that the judgment issued in criminal matters is authoritative in the civil lawsuit.

In the ruling, the court confirmed that it was clear from the papers that the defendant’s mistake was to seize the plaintiff’s money by fraud, and the penal ruling proved that he had seized the plaintiff’s money, after deluding her that he was working as a manager in a car company and would extract a car for her in return for this amount, except That it was a figment of the imagination, and she was surprised that she had fallen victim to a fraud, which prompted her to submit a report to the police, which resulted in the criminal case, which means that the defendant is occupied with the amount of money that he seized.

The court commented on the compensation request, that the error for which the defendant was convicted is the same as the error on which the plaintiff relied in filing the compensation case, and then the elements of tort responsibility were available before him, and the error would lead to material and moral damage as a result of the fraud that occurred On the part of the defendant, which makes her request for compensation for the damages she suffered has been based on fact and law and worthy of acceptance.

The court ruled to obligate the defendant to pay the plaintiff an amount of 489,500 dirhams, and 20 thousand dirhams as reparative compensation for the damages she sustained, and to obligate the defendant to pay the plaintiff the delayed interest on the amount awarded at the rate of 5% annually from the date of this judgment becoming final and conclusive until full payment Not exceeding the original amount adjudged, in addition to obligating the defendant to pay the fees and expenses of the case.

Follow our latest local and sports news and the latest political and economic developments via Google news