I assaulted a security guard and insulted my religious sanctuary

Imprisonment and deportation of an “Arab” resident due to “abuse and racism”

A resident (Arab) committed a number of crimes against a security guard in the building in which she resides in Dubai, assigning her a sentence of six months imprisonment and then deportation, after being convicted of insulting and directing racist expressions to the guard, insulting religious sanctities, as well as destroying and demolishing property owned by others.

The incident began, as established in the certainty of the court, when the victim, who works as a security guard in a building in Al Nahda area, was on the job after performing the dawn prayer. the building.

For his part, the guard told her that he did not have the main key, so she asked him to break the door of the room, but he refused, explaining to her that he is just a guard and does not have the authority to break the doors, so she left him and went to her room.

The guard said in the investigations of the Public Prosecution that she returned to him after five minutes and he was sitting, so she harassed him and pushed him several times and hit him on the head from behind, and insulted a religious symbol he was in possession of. discrimination based on colour.

He added that she later went to the reception of the building and destroyed three screens of medium-sized surveillance cameras, and connection cables worth 3,344 dirhams, as she threw the screens on the ground, breaking them and no longer usable.

While the victim was trying to preserve these movables and keep them away from the place, she bit him hard in the forearm of his left hand, and he sustained a superficial wound.

The accused also admitted in the Public Prosecution’s investigations to the charges of assault and damage, acknowledging the breaking of the monitoring screens, due to the guard’s refusal to inform the owner of the building to come and open the door of her apartment. The phrases you uttered.

The report of the General Department of Criminal Evidence regarding the unloading of the incident from the surveillance cameras recorded the arrival of the accused to the place of the victim while he was performing the prayer, and a conversation took place between them and then she returned to him again, while he was performing a religious ritual and harassed him several times, until he tried to put his hand in front of her to defend himself. But she approached him and put her face in front of his, so he pushed her away from him, then appeared while throwing screens, and committed other actions that included insulting religious sanctities.

The court confirmed in the rationale of its ruling that it was satisfied with the confession of the accused in the police inference record and the investigations of the Public Prosecution, as it came from a free and conscious will and agreed with the truth and the fact according to other evidence that included the report of the Electronic Evidence Department of the General Administration of Criminal Evidence after emptying the record of the surveillance cameras.

She indicated that the Public Prosecution charged the accused with five accusations, the first being contempt of religion by insulting a heavenly book, discrimination based on color, assaulting the integrity of the victim's body, the fourth damaging money owned by others, consisting of three monitors, and the fifth, insulting the victim.

The court decided that these crimes were indivisibly linked to each other, and occurred for one purpose, so it was necessary to consider them as one crime and to pass the penalty for the first and second counts as the most severe punishment.

• The accused assaulted the guard and broke 3 monitors after he refused to break the door to her room.

Follow our latest local and sports news and the latest political and economic developments via Google news