China News Service, Beijing, February 11 (Reporter Kan Feng) After more than 20 days on TV, Zhou Jiangyong was arrested.
The Supreme People's Procuratorate released news on the 11th that Zhou Jiangyong, the former secretary of the Hangzhou Municipal Party Committee, was arrested on suspicion of taking bribes.
Screenshot of the anti-corruption feature film "Zero Tolerance".
Hangzhou former secretary who engages in family corruption
On the 11th, the Supreme People's Procuratorate announced that Zhou Jiangyong, a former member of the Standing Committee of the Zhejiang Provincial Party Committee and former secretary of the Hangzhou Municipal Party Committee, was suspected of taking bribes.
A few days ago, the Supreme People's Procuratorate made a decision to arrest Zhou Jiangyong on suspicion of taking bribes.
The case is being further processed.
The last time Zhou Jiangyong was noticed by public opinion was more than 20 days ago when he appeared in the anti-corruption blockbuster "Zero Tolerance" to repent.
Zhou Jiangyong is a local cadre in Zhejiang. He has served in Ningbo, Zhoushan, Wenzhou, and Hangzhou in Zhejiang. In August 2021, he was investigated as a member of the Standing Committee of the Zhejiang Provincial Party Committee and secretary of the Hangzhou Municipal Party Committee.
On January 26 this year, the website of the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection and State Supervision Commission announced that Zhou Jiangyong was "double-opened".
According to the report of the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection and the State Supervision Commission, Zhou Jiangyong's problems involve politics, economy, four styles, and cadre selection and appointment.
For example, "following the Party Central Committee's decision-making and deployment", "collaborating with capital, supporting the disorderly expansion of capital, and engaging in superstitious activities", "distributing security personnel and official vehicles in violation of regulations", "selection and appointment of cadres at the request of private business owners in violation of regulations", "collaborating with relatives" Illegally accepting huge amounts of property and engaging in family-style corruption”, etc.
Zhou Jiangyong's statement of "collaborating with capital and supporting the disorderly expansion of capital" is a rare expression in the issue briefings of fallen officials.
At the sixth plenary session of the 19th Central Commission for Discipline Inspection held last month, "focusing on investigating and punishing corrupt behaviors behind disorderly expansion of capital and platform monopoly, and cutting the link between power and capital" was written into the communiqué of the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection for the first time.
Accused of scheming against organisational censorship
Zhou Jiangyong's question also included "confrontation against organizational censorship", and he was accused of "violating the Party Central Committee's decision-making and deployment" and "deliberately confronting organizational censorship."
Previously, the anti-corruption feature film "Zero Tolerance" revealed Zhou Jiangyong's "deliberation" to avoid supervision. He practiced "one family, two systems".
For example, Shi Shihong, the owner of a construction company, took the initiative to find a relationship and got acquainted with Zhou Jianyong. Zhou Jianyong also helped Shi Shihong to contract projects through his brother. The brothers jointly accepted huge bribes and invested in the family business as capital.
From 2013 to 2017, Zhou Jiangyong provided assistance to Shi Shihong in a number of projects involving Zhoushan and Wenzhou in accordance with Zhou Jianyong's request. The total amount of money sent is more than 90 million yuan.
Zhou Jiangyong believes that supervision can be avoided by setting up a "firewall".
In the process of accepting Shi Shihong's bribes, he never had contact with Shi Shihong himself, and he used his younger brother as a bridge.
Regarding the "resistance organization review", in 2016, the website of the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection and the State Supervision Commission explained in a case study how to identify and deal with the "resistance organization review" behavior.
According to official explanations, confrontation with organizational censorship can occur either after the organization decides to review, or after the disciplinary violation is implemented and before the organization decides to review.
For example, after receiving money from others, the person under review signs a false loan agreement with the sender in order to prevent possible future investigation and punishment by the organization.
(Finish)