China News Service, January 28. According to the official Weibo news of the Qingdao Intermediate People's Court of Shandong Province, on January 28, 2022, the Qingdao Intermediate People's Court of Shandong Province publicly sentenced Dong Hong, the former deputy head of the Central Inspection Team, to accept bribes. Defendant Dong Hong was sentenced to death for accepting bribes, suspended for two years, deprived of political rights for life, and confiscated all personal property.
Dong Hong said in court that he would obey the court's decision and would not appeal.
After the trial, it was found that: from 1999 to 2020, the defendant, Dong Hongyu, served as a member of the bankruptcy liquidation team of Guangdong International Trust and Investment Corporation, the deputy secretary-general of the Hainan Provincial Committee of the Communist Party of China, the deputy secretary-general of the Beijing Municipal People's Government, the deputy director of the Central Literature Research Office, The convenience of the position of the deputy head of the central inspection team, as well as the convenient conditions for the formation of power and status, through the behavior of staff in other countries, to seek benefits for relevant units and individuals in project development, project contracting, and job promotion, etc., The total amount of illegally receiving property directly or through others is equivalent to more than 463 million yuan.
The Qingdao Intermediate People's Court held that the defendant Dong Hong's behavior constituted the crime of accepting bribes, and the amount of bribes was particularly huge, the circumstances of the crime were particularly serious, the social impact was particularly bad, and it caused particularly heavy losses to the interests of the country and the people, and should be sentenced to death for the crime.
Given that Dong Hong voluntarily surrendered himself, confessed all his crimes truthfully, and had the circumstance of surrendering himself, and he was able to plead guilty and repent, and actively returned the stolen goods, all the illicit money and stolen goods were recovered to the case, and there were multiple statutory and discretionary circumstances for lenient punishment. Execute immediately.
The court made the above judgment.Keywords: