Al-Sisi refers the “courtwoman” to the pension

Egyptian President Abdel-Fattah El-Sisi has referred Counselor Noha El-Imam El-Sayed Mohamed El-Imam, the attorney general at the Administrative Prosecution, to the pension, with the addition of an exceptional eight-year service period for her service.

This comes based on the approval of the Supreme Council of Administrative Prosecution in its session held on September 6, 2020, and based on what was presented by Counselor Omar Marwan, Minister of Justice to the President of the Republic.

The Nuzha Appellate Misdemeanors Court had ruled on September 20, accepting the Public Prosecution’s appeal against the acquittal of Chancellor Nuha Al-Imam Al-Sayyid Muhammad Al-Imam Al-Sheikh, the Public Prosecutor of the Administrative Prosecution, known as “the court lady”, in the case of her assault on a police officer from the security court. Heliopolis, and the court sentenced her to 3 months in prison with a suspended sentence, and the civil case was referred to the competent court.

Counselor Hamada Al-Sawy, Attorney General, had referred the chancellor to the criminal trial for accusing her of insulting a police officer by gesture and word while performing his job, and because of her assault with force and violence. It causes financial damage.

And the investigations of the Public Prosecution ended with the imam’s assault on the commander of the guards of the Heliopolis Courts complex by saying when he inspected the security situation in the court, after he alerted her to the necessity of wearing a medical mask in accordance with the precautionary measures, and stopping filming it by some court employees while performing their work, which constitutes an act punishable by law, and a reservation on Her mobile phone to stop filming, as she assaulted him, destroyed his military rank and a wireless device in his possession and caused injuries to him, so he kept her, and issued a note on the incident attached to a photo of her that had been circulated on social media.

By asking the Public Prosecution office, a lawyer and a worker were present at the court at the time of the incident, and they testified to the content of the victim’s testimony, and confirmed that the accused had infringed him by saying, beating, and destroying movable property, while the accused claimed during her interrogation that she was defending herself after the officer had made a verbal altercation with her.

By examining the accused’s phone, it was found that there were 6 photographs taken from inside the court, in which some hesitant and employees appeared, and it was confirmed that they were taken on the day of the incident, so the Public Prosecution decided to refer her to the criminal trial for the crimes she had committed.

Follow our latest local and sports news and the latest political and economic developments via Google news