All parties, except FI, support the proposal that the city should set up its own surveillance cameras in Akalla and Husby.
According to the ruling Moderates, this is a measure that will partly solve the police shortage in the city.
The places must be chosen in consultation with the police, but mainly in public places where a lot of crime is committed.
Rinkeby metro is highlighted as a positive example by the Liberals.
Moderates: Positive
The moderates want to set up more cameras, mainly in so-called hot-spots, where a lot of crime is committed.
They believe that increased camera surveillance is needed because the police in Stockholm County are too few.
“Cameras both prevent and help solve crimes. The disadvantage is, of course, the issue of privacy, but we believe that it is a greater threat to the privacy of ordinary people when gang criminals go free ”.
Liberals: Positive
The Liberals want more cameras in unsafe places.
They mention the cameras in Rinkeby's metro as a good example and want to investigate the possibility of also setting up cameras in stairwells and gates.
"The cameras are primarily there to solve crimes. They often lead to crime moving away from, for example, well-visited downtown environments, rather than reducing crime itself. ”
Center: Positive
The center wants to set up more cameras, but always in consultation with the police and the local district committees.
To protect privacy, the party wants to see clear rules for use.
"Ideally, we would not want any cameras at all. The great insecurity that many feel in their immediate environment, together with too many unsolved serious crimes, makes the Center Party think that camera surveillance is an important part of increasing security. ”
Christian Democrats: Positive
The Christian Democrats are driving the work of increasing the number of cameras in the city.
Crime prevention and investigation of serious crimes are stated as the most important reason.
The party also wants to make it easier for the police to get more cameras.
"More cameras are in demand by both the police and the public. We want to see more cameras in squares, parks and other places for crime prevention purposes. ”
Green Party: Quite positive
The Green Party only wants to see expanded camera surveillance in consultation with the police.
The party points out that more cameras are insufficient as a single security measure and wants to see a larger package of measures for security.
“More human eyes in the city, in the form of night walkers, field workers and police, is a better way to create mutual trust than more camera lenses. ”
Social Democrats: Positive
The Social Democrats want to see more cameras to increase security and solve more crimes - how and where to take place in close dialogue with the Stockholm police.
“Cameras are a good complement to the security work and fulfill an important function.
Not least, it is an important tool for the police when crimes are to be solved. "
Left Party: Less positive
The Left Party wants to see increased camera surveillance as a complement to other more effective measures.
But not without good reason.
"It is good if it can make a place safer but should not be used casually, we do not want a surveillance society."
Sweden Democrats: Positive
SD wants to see increased camera surveillance to increase security for Stockholmers and visitors.
The needs analysis considers that they should be done by the police and the relevant authorities.
"This is a measure we have been advocating for a long time. That now all other parties think it is time to develop this is of course something we are happy about. "
Feminist Initiative is the only party with a negative attitude towards camera surveillance - hear why in the video.