Great Britain, Parliament approves the green pass but it is Tory revolt
Supreme Court Brazil: green pass for visitors
Privacy Guarantor approves the new rules for the use and revocation of the green pass
Share
December 15, 2021 The two conflicts of attribution between powers are "inadmissible" for the Constitutional Court, promoted, respectively, by eight deputies enrolled in the component of the mixed group '' The Alternative is there '' and by Senator Gianluigi Paragone on Green pass required to enter Parliament.
Both concerned the resolutions by which the internal organs of the Chamber and Senate - in the light of article 9 quinquies of law decree no. 52 of 2021 - requested the Green pass to participate in parliamentary proceedings. Pending the filing of the order, the Press Office of the Constitutional Court makes it known that the conflicts have been declared inadmissible.
The Court held that the appeals did not reveal any manifest damage to the powers of the parliamentarians and that the interpretation and application of the respective regulations belong to the autonomy of the two Chambers. In both cases the applicants acted as individual parliamentarians and complained about the impairment of their own constitutional powers.
In particular, they denounced the procedures for adopting the obligation of the Green pass: the latter was introduced by deliberations of internal bodies in the Chambers (Office / Presidency Council and College of Quaestors) rather than through a modification of the parliamentary regulations for which it would be an absolute majority of the members of each Chamber was necessary. The applicants therefore considered the regulatory reservation (article 64 of the Constitution) to be violated and, above all, the participation of individual parliamentarians in the legislative procedure was restricted, as well as harming the free development of their mandate.