China News Service, Beijing, December 1 (Reporter Zhang Su) On December 1, the Supreme People's Procuratorate of China released 5 typical cases of follow-up and supervision of civil prosecutions, including follow-up and supervision of common high-incidence false litigation behaviors.
Civil procuratorial follow-up supervision refers to situations where “the judgments, rulings, and mediation documents made by the courts in the trial of civil protest cases are still obviously wrong.” The procuratorate may re-supervise in accordance with relevant regulations or submit it to a higher procuratorate for supervision.
Feng Xiaoguang, director of the Sixth Procuratorate of the Supreme People’s Procuratorate, said earlier that this action corrects public power behavior and at the same time realizes private rights relief for applicants for supervision.
In the “Follow-up and Supervision Case of Private Loan Dispute between Zhou Moufeng and Lin Mouhui and Wuyishan Hua Mou Hotel Co., Ltd." released this time, the prosecutor received an accusation from Lin Mouhui’s creditor He Mouqing and found that Lin Mouhui was Zhou Moufeng's uncle and the court trial were not confrontational.
In the end, the court convicted Hua Mou Hotel, Lin Mouhui, and Zhou Moufeng as guilty of false litigation.
In the “Chen Mouzhen Application for Execution Supervision and Follow-up Supervision Case”, the prosecutors corrected the improper execution of the online judicial auction in accordance with the law.
In the "Zhao Mozhang and Kang Moyong, Kang Mocheng, follow-up and supervision of sales contract disputes", the prosecutors verified the nature of the 73 mu of ecological public welfare forests, logging methods, and logging deadlines, prompting the court to revoke the wrong judgment. Protected the ecological public welfare forest.
In 2020, the Chinese prosecutors accepted a total of 1,150 follow-up supervision cases for the supervision of effective judgment results, a year-on-year increase of 1.2 times; 74 protests were filed after review, a year-on-year increase of 2.5 times.
The person in charge of the Sixth Procuratorate of the Supreme People's Procuratorate stated that this case has a strong practical guiding role.