China News Service, Beijing, November 30 (Reporter Li Hanxue) In response to the US State Department spokesperson's statement last week that the "human rights issues" in Xinjiang, China and other places will affect the US decision on whether to participate in the Beijing Winter Olympics, the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region People's Government News spoke Xu Guixiang said in Beijing on the 30th that the United States is completely uninterested in talking about the so-called "human rights issue" in Xinjiang.

  On the same day, a press conference on Xinjiang-related issues of the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region was held in Beijing.

Xu Gui said in response to the inquiry that at present, Xinjiang’s social stability, economic development, and people’s livelihood are improving. Some US politicians should open their eyes and take a look at how ridiculous their tricks are.

  Xu Guixiang said that, as the relevant UN rapporteur pointed out, the United States itself has a bad record on human rights issues, and the legislative process to protect human rights has been slow.

The United States should focus its resources and energy on improving the well-being of its people.

  In response to the recent "Australian Institute for Strategic Policy Research" research report and attacks on the governance measures taken in Xinjiang, the spokesperson of the People's Government of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region Yilijiang Anayiti responded. There are serious ideological prejudices.

On November 30, a press conference on Xinjiang-related issues by the People's Government of the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region was held in Beijing.

In response to the recent "Australian Institute for Strategic Policy Research" research report and attacks on the governance measures taken in Xinjiang, the spokesperson of the People's Government of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region Yilijiang Anayiti responded. There are serious ideological prejudices.

Photo by China News Agency reporter Tian Yuhao

  He pointed out that the agency is not an independent agency at all.

Evidence shows that the agency has long received funding from US defense, diplomatic agencies, and arms dealers. It has a strong anti-China ideology and is keen to concoct and hype various anti-China lies.

The agency’s reports, opinions, and clues either come from US anti-China NGOs or use so-called “witness evidence” that cannot be verified or traced back to the source.

Former Australian Consul General in Hong Kong Mei Zhuolin criticized the scholar Hamilton of the institute for lacking a basic understanding of China’s political system; the Australian Civic Party’s publication "Australian Alert Service" once issued an article saying that the agency spared no effort to "war" against China led by the United States Service has been completely reduced to a tool of other countries.

  Yilijiang Anayiti stated that the measures taken by Xinjiang to counter terrorism and de-radicalization, social governance, and labor and employment conform to the expectations of the people of all ethnic groups in Xinjiang, conform to Xinjiang’s reality, and proceed in strict accordance with the law. There is absolutely no violation of human rights. problem.

This is obvious to all around the world, and it is by no means able to obliterate anti-China "vanguards" and pseudo-scholars dressed in "academic" cloaks.

  Regarding the recent Xinjiang-related remarks made by the anti-China scholar Zheng Guoen (Adrian Zengzi), Xu Guixiang responded that he disregarded the facts and spread a lot of lies and fallacies in the international community.

We warn people like Zheng Guoen not to bluff and deceive everywhere in an academic cloak.

We have noticed that relevant parties are using legal channels to pursue the legal responsibility of such pseudo-scholars as Zheng Guoen.

(over)