Xinhua News Agency, Beijing, November 5th

  The U.S.'s malicious slander against China on the issue of the tracing of the new crown virus and the facts


  For a period of time, the US has concocted various lies and rumors against China on the issue of virus traceability, which has long been slapped by China and the international community with detailed facts and data.

So far, more than 80 countries and more than 300 political parties, social organizations and think tanks have opposed the politicization of traceability issues in various ways.

  Recently, the US intelligence agency released a declassified report on the so-called tracing of the novel coronavirus, continuing to ignore the laws of scientific tracing, alluding to "the Wuhan Virus Research Institute leaked the virus," accusing China of lack of transparency and obstructing international investigations.

Traceability is a scientific issue. The US uses intelligence agencies to trace the source, putting inferior lies that have already been criticized, and putting them in an intelligence "vest". The real purpose is to confuse people and deceive the world, and continue to engage in "presumption of guilt" and political conduct. To find out the source of the problem, to blame, suppress and contain China.

  Based on the so-called U.S. investigation report and public materials from all parties, we once again list the malicious slanders concocted by the U.S. on the issue of virus traceability, and make the truth known to the world, so that the conspiracy and tricks of “political traceability” and “intelligence traceability” are useless. Retreat.

first part

  The U.S.'s malicious defamation of China on the issue of source tracing and the facts

  Disregarding science and facts, the United States has repeatedly fabricated lies to smear and accuse China.

China puts people’s life safety and physical health first, decisively launched the fight against the epidemic, and adopted the most comprehensive, rigorous and thorough “hard-core” prevention and control measures to effectively block the chain of virus transmission.

China adheres to the concept of a community of human health and health, immediately notified the international community of epidemic information, shared prevention, control and treatment experience with all parties without reservation, provided anti-epidemic assistance to the best of its ability, and took the lead in launching the world's largest vaccine cooperation operation. Make outstanding contributions to world public health security.

China has always taken a scientific attitude and actively participated in global scientific tracing cooperation. It has twice invited experts from the World Health Organization to China to carry out virus tracing research in order to make China's contribution to the ultimate victory of mankind in the epidemic.

  1. Regarding the U.S. claim that clusters of new coronary pneumonia cases first appeared in Wuhan

  Malicious defamation 1: The first cluster of new coronary pneumonia cases appeared in Wuhan, China in December 2019.

  Fact: More and more clues, reports and studies have shown that the new crown pneumonia epidemic has appeared in many places around the world as early as the second half of 2019.

The time of the outbreak in the United States was earlier than the time of officially confirmed cases.

The Italian testing agency reports that the virus may even begin to spread as early as the end of the summer of 2019.

  ◆On December 27, 2019, Hubei Provincial Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine reported a case of pneumonia of unknown cause to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention of Jianghan District, Wuhan City.

On January 3, 2020, China began to regularly and proactively report the epidemic information to the World Health Organization, relevant countries including the United States, and China's Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan regions.

  In January 2021, the World Health Organization joint expert group survey showed that there was no evidence that there was a large-scale spread of the new crown epidemic in the months before the Wuhan outbreak in December 2019.

It is unlikely that a certain scale of new coronavirus infection will occur in Wuhan in October and November 2019.

  ◆ The National Institutes of Health analysis of more than 24,000 American people's blood samples collected in the first three months of 2020 shows that the new coronavirus appeared in the United States in December 2019, several weeks before the official first confirmed case.

  The research conducted by the University of California, Los Angeles and the University of Washington shows that the number of patients with respiratory symptoms and diseases has increased significantly from late December 2019 until February 2020, indicating that the new coronavirus has been before clinical awareness and detection capabilities are available. Spread in American communities.

  In March 2020, Robert Redfield, then director of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, publicly admitted at a hearing in the U.S. House of Representatives that some of the flu deaths were actually infected with new coronary pneumonia.

The US also stated that it will conduct a "comprehensive retrospective investigation and research" across the country.

  In May 2020, the Mayor of Belleville, New Jersey, United States, Michael Melham said that he may have been infected with the new coronavirus in November 2019, and test results also showed that the antibodies in his body have been present for a long time.

  In May 2020, "USA Today" reported that 171 patients with new coronary pneumonia in Florida, the United States had symptoms as early as January 2020, and none of them had travel experience in China, which was better than the first case of new coronary pneumonia officially reported in the state. The case appeared two months earlier.

  In June 2021, the "Medical News Network" reported that from December 13, 2019 to January 17, 2020, 106 samples of routine blood donation archives in 9 U.S. states showed positive responses to the new coronavirus detection antibody, of which 84 had medium And activity.

  In July 2021, the official website of the U.S. Department of Agriculture announced that the results of a study recently completed by its subordinate Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service showed that Illinois, Michigan, New York and Pennsylvania collected from January 2020 to 2021 Among the 481 North American white-tailed deer animal samples, 33% have detected antibodies to the new coronavirus, and 67% of the samples collected in Michigan have detected antibodies.

This is the first time that a new coronavirus neutralizing antibody has been detected in a wild animal. The presence of antibodies proves that a large number of white-tailed deer in the United States have long been infected with the new coronavirus.

The above study also showed that in the 143 white-tailed deer samples collected before January 2020, 1 case of new coronavirus antibodies was detected.

This means that as early as 2019, the new coronavirus infection has appeared in the American white-tailed deer population.

  In August 2021, the California San Jose Courier published an exclusive report, revealing that the new crown virus had spread in the United States as early as December or even November 2019, and caused many deaths in early January 2020.

These early deaths were distributed in different states in the United States, and some places were remote, and local people had very little contact with China.

Experts said that a more in-depth analysis of early deaths in the United States is needed.

  The Palm Beach Post and the Miami Herald both disclosed that the Florida Department of Health website published data on 171 local patients who had symptoms of new crown pneumonia or tested positive for the new crown virus in January and February 2020. However, These data were deleted inexplicably.

  There are a large number of posts on American social media published in the first half of 2020, showing that more than 200 people from the United States or countries closely related to the United States said that as early as around November 2019, they or others had been infected with suspected infections. The new crown virus disease, these people are real foreign netizens.

  Pagrinawan, the former press officer of the Philippine Embassy in the United States, detailed the timetable for the outbreak of the new coronavirus in the United States in his new book "Vaccines Cannot Cure the Racist Virus", and judged that the start time of the new coronavirus in the United States is June 2019. Then spread to all parts of the world.

  In September 2021, the Chinese Academy of Sciences preprint platform (ChinaXiv) released a study on the origin time of the new crown pneumonia epidemic based on big data modeling analysis.

Researchers established an optimized model based on infectious disease transmission models and big data analysis methods. Based on published data, they inferred the origin of the epidemic in 12 states in the northeastern United States, Wuhan, Zhejiang and other places in China.

The results of the study show that for the 12 states in the northeastern United States, the date of the first 50% infection of the new crown pneumonia epidemic is mostly between August and October 2019, and the earliest is April 26, 2019 in Rhode Island, and the latest It was November 30, 2019 in Delaware, which was earlier than the officially announced date of the first confirmed case in the United States, January 20, 2020.

The calculation results show that there is a high probability that the new crown pneumonia epidemic in the United States has begun to spread around September 2019.

  ◆In November 2020, the National Tumor Research Institute of Milan, Italy, and the University of Milan, and other institutions published the results of the new coronavirus serum antibody test on 959 blood samples sampled from September 2019 to March 2020, and the positive rate reached 11.6%. Among them, 23 samples collected in September 2019 were positive.

  In January 2021, the Italian news agency "Local Italy" reported that in November 2019, a skin biopsy sample of an Italian woman was found to be reactive to the novel coronavirus in situ hybridization.

  In July 2021, when institutions such as the University of Milan in Italy conducted sample testing, 13 out of 156 cases were found to have molecular evidence of new coronary pneumonia infection. Among them, samples of 11 cases were collected from August 2019 to February 2020. The time of the outbreak of the new crown epidemic officially announced in Italy.

In addition, on September 12, 2019, a urine sample of Italian measles patients was found to be positive for the new coronavirus nucleic acid, and the sequencing results have been uploaded to the public database.

This means that the new crown virus may have spread in Italy by the end of the summer of 2019.

  ◆In May 2020, the French medical journal "International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents" published a paper entitled "The new crown virus has spread in France at the end of December 2019".

The researchers selected 14 cases of influenza disease in the intensive care unit from December 2, 2019 to January 16, 2020, and re-tested the new coronavirus nucleic acid in April 2020, and found that a 42-year-old man's sample was positive.

The lack of association between the case and China and no history of foreign travel before the onset of the disease indicates that the new coronavirus has spread in France at the end of December 2019.

According to public information, the prevalence of neutralizing antibodies in France increased in mid-December 2019. In December 2019, a throat swab sample from a hemoptysis patient in France tested positive for the new coronavirus RNA.

  ◆In June 2020, the University of Barcelona in Spain issued an announcement stating that researchers from the enterovirus team of the school had detected the presence of the new coronavirus in a wastewater sample on January 15, 2020.

  2. Regarding the U.S. falsely claiming that the Wuhan Institute of Virology of the Chinese Academy of Sciences may leak the new crown virus

  Malicious defamation 2: The outbreak of the new crown pneumonia epidemic may be directly related to the Wuhan Institute of Virology of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (hereinafter referred to as "Wuhan Institute of Virology").

  The truth: the outbreak of the new crown pneumonia has nothing to do with the Wuhan virus.

  ◆In May and August 2020, Wang Yanyi, director of Wuhan Institute of Virology, was interviewed by China International Television (CGTN) and National Broadcasting Corporation (NBC), respectively, and said that the statement that the new crown virus was leaked by Wuhan virus was "completely out of nothing." , The institute “has not been in contact with, studied or stored” the new coronavirus before.

  ◆In March 2021, Wuhan Institute of Virology issued a statement stating that before December 30, 2019, the Institute had not been exposed to the 2019 novel coronavirus.

  ◆ Authoritative figures in the international scientific community have repeatedly refuted the so-called "Wuhan laboratory leak theory".

  In February 2021, at the press conference of the China-WHO Joint Expert Group on Novel Coronavirus Traceability Research, the foreign team leader Anbarek said that the expert team had in-depth and candid discussions with relevant Chinese personnel and learned more about it. The Wuhan laboratory’s management, work practices, and recent virus research have concluded that it is extremely unlikely that the “Wuhan laboratory leak” will cause an epidemic.

  ◆ In an interview with CNN, Peter Dasak, chairman of the American Ecological Health Alliance, who has been cooperating with Wuhan Virus Institute for 15 years, said that Wuhan Virus Laboratory does not have the virus that caused the new crown pneumonia epidemic, so the virus It is impossible to originate from the Wuhan laboratory.

  In June 2021, Bloomberg News reported that Australian virologist Danielle Anderson, who had been visiting the Wuhan Virus Institute for several months, said that she had described the Wuhan laboratory in some media outside China and the Chinese scientists. Shocked by the attack.

  In July 2021, 24 internationally renowned experts published a paper in The Lancet, stating that there is currently no scientific evidence to support the theory that the new crown virus leaked from a Chinese laboratory.

Scientists from the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia and other countries published a preprinted article on the European scientific data sharing platform Zenodo, stating that "there is no evidence that the new coronavirus came from the Wuhan laboratory" and that "there is no evidence that any early cases are linked to the Wuhan virus. ", "There is no evidence that the Wuhan virus owned or studied the ancestors of the new coronavirus before the pandemic."

  ◆In August 2021, 21 virologists from the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, China, Australia, and Austria published papers in the journal Cell, and concluded that “there is no evidence that there is any link between the early cases of new coronary pneumonia and the Wuhan virus. , And there is no evidence that the ancestors of the new coronavirus were possessed or studied before the pandemic.” The virus is more likely to spread from animal hosts to humans, and “the new coronavirus has several characteristics of previous zoonotic events”.

  ◆September 2021, a study published in the preprint platform "Research Plaza" of the British "Nature" showed that the coronavirus and the new coronavirus carried by the chrysanthemum bats that inhabit some caves in northern Laos have common key characteristics , Which shows that there are viruses closely related to the new coronavirus in nature.

The paper shows that researchers collected samples from the above-mentioned chrysanthemum bats that inhabit some caves in northern Laos, and found three bat coronaviruses that are highly similar to the new coronavirus receptor binding domain (RBD) in these samples.

The researchers pointed out that the viruses code-named BANAL-52, BANAL-103 and BANAL-236 are "the closest known to the new coronavirus to date" bat coronavirus.

The BANAL-236 virus has almost the same RBD as the new coronavirus.

Mark Eliot, one of the authors of the paper and the head of pathogen exploration at the Pasteur Institute, said that these three bat coronaviruses may be the source of the new coronavirus and may pose a substantial risk of direct transmission to humans.

  ◆In June 2021, Christopher Ford, former Assistant Secretary of State of the United States Department of State, issued an open letter exposing the process by which the Arms Control, Verification and Compliance Agency (AVC) of the United States Department of State concocted and disseminated the "laboratory leak theory".

From December 2020 to early January 2021, under the direction of the then U.S. Secretary of State Pompeo, Yu Maochun, the U.S. Department of State Policy Planning Office, instructed the Assistant Secretary of State Assistant Thomas Dinano and the consultant David Asher to bypass the biologics Scientific and biological weapons experts have assessed and continued to promote false assertions such as "the new crown virus is a biological weapon deliberately released by the Chinese government" to various departments of the US State Department.

After Ford sent several emails reminding them that they must organize scientists to conduct a serious assessment, AVC held an expert meeting in January this year.

Participating experts pointed out the key errors in the relevant documents at the meeting site.

Ford then emailed several senior State Department officials to inform about the meeting, pointing out that there were major problems with AVC's judgments.

According to Ford's inference, the senior officials of the US State Department may therefore not mention the "biological weapons theory" in the "Statement Note: Wuhan Virus Institute Activities" published on January 15 of that year, and instead proposed that "the new crown virus may originate from an accidental laboratory leak." Speculative statement.

  Malicious defamation 3: The personnel of Wuhan Institute of Virology were accidentally infected while collecting virus samples in the wild.

Three employees of Wuhan Institute of Virology were infected with the epidemic in November 2019.

  The truth is that none of the staff and graduate students of Wuhan Institute of Virology has been infected with the new crown virus.

  ◆In March 2021, the Wuhan Institute of Virology issued a statement stating that until now, its employees and graduate students have maintained zero infections.

  ◆ Western media reports that "3 researchers from Wuhan Institute of Virology visited the hospital in November 2019, and the symptoms were consistent with the new coronavirus infection" report was completely out of nothing.

China has repeatedly asked the questioner to announce the names of these three people in order to make the facts clear, but no one has provided them so far.

  ◆ In June 2021, Bloomberg News reported that the Australian virologist Danielle Anderson, who has visited Wuhan Virus several times, said that by the end of 2019, no one she knew in Wuhan Virus had become ill.

Anderson also said that when many colleagues from Wuhan came to Singapore for a meeting in December 2019, no one had discussed the spread of any "disease" in the laboratory.

  Malicious defamation 4: The management of the P4 laboratory of Wuhan Institute of Virology is "unscientific" and there are "security loopholes."

  The truth: The P4 laboratory of Wuhan Institute of Virology is a Sino-French government cooperation project, with strict protective facilities and measures.

  ◆As the laboratory with the highest level of biosafety protection, Wuhan P4 laboratory has not had any pathogen leakage or personal infection accidents since it was officially put into operation in 2018.

Wuhan P4 laboratory is designed, constructed and operated in accordance with international requirements and national standards. It not only has stable and reliable biosafety protection facilities, but also has established a complete biosafety management system and a team of professional support management and maintenance personnel.

The hardware facilities, management level, staff, and working methods of the Wuhan P4 laboratory are the same as those of other P4 laboratories operating safely in the world.

  Malicious defamation 5: Satellite images show that in October 2019, the number of vehicles in the parking lots of several hospitals such as Wuhan Zhongnan Hospital and Hubei Maternity and Child Health Hospital increased significantly compared with the same period in 2018. At the same time, Baidu searched for "cough" and "diarrhea" The number of words such as "has soared, so the new crown pneumonia may begin to spread in Wuhan at the end of August 2019.

  Facts: The relevant inferences are purely subjective, and the examples on which they are based cannot lead to corresponding conclusions. The relevant reports and studies are all absurd.

  ◆ In response, the World Health Organization stated that it cannot interpret the changes in the number of cars in hospital parking lots and "jump" two or three inferences, linking this to the new crown pneumonia epidemic.

  ◆China Baidu Company responded to this question with an index chart.

The chart shows that the search volume for "cough" and "diarrhea" has not changed significantly from previous years, and the search volume for "diarrhea" has decreased slightly around December 2019.

  ◆Zeng Guang, a high-level expert from the National Health Commission of China on the prevention and control of new coronary pneumonia, wrote an article that the study is a typical misuse of big data epidemiology and is very absurd in many aspects.

One is absurd in time.

The study pushed the spread of the new crown virus to August 2019 based on parking lot traffic and Baidu search data. The Wuhan Military Games was held in October of that year. If the virus had spread in August, then people from all over the world would come to participate in the Military Games. It is impossible for a soldier to be unconscious, and it is impossible for a U.S. soldier to go to a local hospital for medical treatment because of illness, let alone not notice it.

The second is the absurd understanding of the disease.

The study used data from Hubei Maternity and Child Health Hospital as one of the main evidences. This hospital is the main pediatric hospital in Wuhan, but the main people infected with new coronary pneumonia are not children, and the child infection rate is relatively low.

Third, it is ridiculous to search for "cough" and "diarrhea" as keywords.

Many patients with new coronary pneumonia have cough symptoms in the early stage, but not many have diarrhea symptoms in the early stage, and the symptoms will eventually become pneumonia.

If the virus has spread in August 2019, why haven't these symptoms turned into pneumonia for such a long time?

  Malicious defamation 6: The Wuhan Institute of Virology is only about 300 yards (about 0.27 kilometers) from the South China Seafood Market.

  Fact: The Wuhan Center for Disease Control and Prevention is about 300 yards from the South China Seafood Market.

Wuhan Institute of Virology is more than ten kilometers away from the South China Seafood Market, with the Yangtze River in between.

  Malicious defamation 7: McCall, the Republican leader of the Foreign Affairs Committee of the US House of Representatives, published an investigation report on Wuhan Virus Institute, saying that Wuhan Virus Institute had issued an air conditioning system renovation contract worth 606 million U.S. dollars. This contract made people suspect air conditioners before the epidemic. Whether the system can work normally.

  Fact: The actual value of this contract is US$606,000. McCall reported a low-level error in the decimal point of the data and was copied and spread by irresponsible mainstream American media, exposing the United States hastily fabricated credentials and lacked independent and rigorous professionalism. .

  ◆ The McCall report also exaggerated the funding of the other six projects of the Wuhan Institute of Virology by 100 or 10 times.

For example, in the report, the security services of the Zhengdian Park of the Wuhan Institute of Virology, the maintenance of the P3 laboratory and the laboratory animal center, and the renovation of the hazardous waste treatment system cost 1.3 million U.S. dollars (about 8.3 million yuan) and 401,300 U.S. dollars (about 2.6 million yuan). ) And 1.5213 million US dollars (approximately 9.86 million yuan), while the actual amount is 830,000 yuan, 260,000 yuan and 986,000 yuan.

  When citing relevant data, McCall’s "researchers" removed the decimal point from the Chinese data, resulting in a slight difference and a thousand miles away.

The US "Washington Post", "Wall Street Journal" and others have quoted and spread the wrong contents of Republican reports without checking the facts.

  Malicious defamation 8: The Sierra Nevada Company, the main contractor of the US Department of Defense, once issued a report saying that the core basis for the new crown virus originating from the Wuhan Virus Institute was that in mid-October 2019, a large number of "roadblocks" were set up on the roads around the Wuhan Virus Institute.

  Fact: The US "Beast Daily" website pointed out by citing facts that the so-called "roadblocks" are actually related to the road works around the Wuhan Institute of Virology, and the traffic near the Wuhan Institute of Virology is no different.

  Malicious defamation 9: Wuhan Institute of Virology has cooperated with the Chinese military to carry out research on the "functional gain" of coronavirus.

  Facts: The Wuhan Institute of Virology has never cooperated with any other parties, including the Chinese military, to conduct research on the “enhancement of functions” of the coronavirus.

  ◆In July 2021, Zeng Yixin, deputy director of the National Health Commission of China, stated at a press conference that Wuhan Institute of Virology has not conducted research on the enhancement of coronaviruses, and there are no so-called artificial viruses.

  ◆In June 2021, Shi Zhengli, a researcher at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, said in an interview with The New York Times that her laboratory had never conducted or cooperated in conducting a "functional gain" experiment to enhance the toxicity of the coronavirus.











































































  另据了解,上述论文中提到的样本最早采样时间是2020年1月30日,距疫情开始已过去一段时间,并不是早期样本。这些样本序列对新冠病毒溯源研究能够提供的信息和价值都是很有限的。但美国弗雷德·哈钦森(Fred Hutchinson)癌症研究中心的一名研究人员杰西·布卢姆(Jesse Bloom)在没有得到中国学者确认,也完全不了解此事来龙去脉的背景下,就杜撰了所谓的阴谋论,声称这是中国想掩盖真相。这种做法背离事实,也违反了科学伦理,遭到许多国家专家批评。











  陆军传染病医学研究所拥有美军方唯一的P4级实验室。该研究所储存有几乎所有已知的高致病性病原体,包括埃博拉病毒、炭疽杆菌、天花病毒、鼠疫杆菌以及非典(SARS)冠状病毒等。该研究所多名研究员从事SARS、中东呼吸综合征(MERS)等冠状病毒相关研究。2003年SARS疫情发生后,该研究所与北卡罗来纳大学巴里克团队合作,研制出一套用于合成SARS病毒的全基因序列克隆平台,相关成果以论文形式发表;论文中称,在获得SARS病毒RNA后的两个月内,即成功合成了SARS病毒全基因序列。这说明上述机构早在2003年已具备极其成熟的SARS相关冠状病毒的合成及改造能力。 -of-new-smallpox-vaccine/

  学术论文:《Methods for Producing Recombinant Coronavirus》、《Cynomolgus Macaque as an Animal Model for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome》、《MERS-CoV Pathogenesis and Antiviral Efficacy of Licensed Drugs in Human Monocyte-Derived Antigen- Presenting Cells》、《Reverse Genetics with a Full-length Infections cDNA of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus》


  学术论文:《Proteolytic Processing of the Ebola Virus Glycoprotein is not Critical for Ebola Virus Replication in Nonhuman Primates》、《African Green Monkey Model of Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (MERS-CoV) Infection》







  学术论文:《Pulmonary Illness Related to E-Cigarette Use in Illinois and Wisconsin--Final Report》


  应对武汉新冠肺炎疫情的中国权威肺病专家在查阅了60篇涉及美国“电子烟肺炎”病例的研究论文,并对其中142位“电子烟肺炎”患者的250张肺部影像图片、临床信息以及文献原文进行了仔细全面研究后,发现这些病例中有16个更有可能是新冠肺炎的“疑诊患者”,有5个临床症状和治疗情况相对完整的患者,还被这些专家认定为 “中度可疑”。而这16个病例中有12个病例的发病时间,都在2020年以前。













  ◆巴里克与德特里克堡内从事高危病毒和冠状病毒研究的两家研究机构,即美国陆军传染病医学研究所(USAMRIID)和美国国家过敏症和传染病研究所下属的“综合研究设施”(The Integrated Research Facility,IRF-Frederick)均有密切联系。大量科研论文显示,巴里克曾与美国陆军传染病医学研究所进行过不少涉及冠状病毒的研究。2018年英国《自然》杂志上的一篇论文显示,来自德特里克堡“综合研究设施”的一位名叫利萨·托尔泽夫斯基(Lisa Torzewski)的研究人员和巴里克合作,用被修改了基因的MERS病毒感染了猴子。

  ◆巴里克曾经教导过的博士生利萨·亨斯利(Lisa Hensley)曾是USAMRIID的科学家,并与巴里克有过多次合作,后来还加入了IRF-Frederick,并担任这家美国政府科研机构的副主任。巴里克拥有的那些丰富的冠状病毒“资源”以及改造和创造冠状病毒的“技术”,也就通过这些合作和人脉,被广泛运用在了德特里克堡内。但应用这些危险病毒技术的USAMRIID、IRF-Frederick乃至巴里克自己在美国北卡罗来纳大学的实验室,都存在不良安全记录,而且都直接涉及从事最危险病毒研究的P4实验室。



























































  ◆ In July 2021, British analyst Tom Fody wrote on the "Russia Today" website that the United States has long used political manipulation to pressure the World Health Organization Secretariat.

As early as a year ago, when the new crown pneumonia epidemic spread to the world, the US government tried every means to carry out various political manipulations against China.

  ◆In January 2021, Peter Dasak, chairman of the American Ecological Health Alliance, as a member of the World Health Organization international expert group, went to Wuhan to conduct a joint traceability study. He publicly responded to the US media's "China obstructs the WHO traceability research in Wuhan" to discredit the argument. , He was threatened by American politicians and had to withdraw from the research project on traceability of the new crown virus.

  ◆On July 28, 2021, at the UN General Assembly’s briefing of the independent expert group on the response and assessment of the new crown pneumonia epidemic, the deputy permanent representative of the United States to the United Nations exclusively attacked China on the issue of traceability, deviated from the theme of the meeting, and slandered China. This is the United States’ interference with the international community. Another example of public health cooperation.

  ◆The Chinese side advocates the promotion of the verification of American biological laboratories under the United Nations biosafety framework, and has submitted to the World Health Organization the two "Questions about Fort Detrick" and "About the University of North Carolina Barrick's Research on Coronavirus." A non-document and an open letter on the World Wide Web that conveyed the voice of the Chinese people and requested the investigation of Fort Detrick, requesting the World Health Organization to conduct formal traceability investigations of the US Army Institute of Infectious Diseases and the University of North Carolina, but it has not received a clear reply.