More than 1.9 million brands have been removed: Why are some grassroots keen to hang up brands
Recently, Shandong has carried out a centralized rectification of the "brand chaos", deeply digging into the formalism and bureaucracy behind the brands. In the past year, a total of more than 1.9 million brands have been removed in the province.
According to the "Economic Information Daily" report, in September last year, the Shandong Provincial Party Committee and Provincial Government Inspection Office surveyed 58 villages (communities) and found that on average, more than 40 signs were hung in each office space.
Dozens of signs are hung up in a village (community) office space, so "spectacular".
It stands to reason that a brand means a responsibility and a job task.
What needs to be asked is, how are these work responsibilities implemented?
If it is fully implemented, what is the working status of the village (community)?
From an economic perspective alone, 1.9 million brands may cost hundreds of millions of dollars.
Why are many units keen on listing?
Judging from the actual situation at the grassroots level, there are two main reasons.
One is to use "trace" instead of actual performance.
Real work is difficult to implement, and it costs less than tens of yuan to hundreds of yuan to hang a sign, but there are visible "work traces". Take a photo, and the work "implements" is easy and "spectacular".
This is naturally the cause of formalism and bureaucracy, and it is also a "helpless move" that the relevant units have no practical measures for their own work.
The second is "picking peaches" and "making noodles."
It is common in our actual work. The better the work is done in the village (community), the more brands there will be.
So, is it because there are so many brands and "mother-in-laws" that the work is done well?
of course not.
Since these advanced villages (communities) often receive the attention of higher-level leaders, there are many "benefits" in putting up a sign. On the one hand, you can show your face when inspecting and guiding work; ) The results are related to their "work".
It is not that the listed companies have not done substantive work, but bureaucracy and formalism are probably the deep-seated factors of the brand chaos.
There are so many brands, but the work has not been implemented. Naturally, the harm is not small.
First of all, this practice of substituting "traces" for "actual performance" pollutes the office environment. If grassroots cadres and masses in "teaching" associations fool their superiors or even the masses.
Secondly, it adds a lot of unnecessary extra burden to the grassroots.
For each listed unit, listing is "burning a stick of incense and respecting each god." The workload does not increase, but the completion of the work indicators seems to be happy for everyone.
For the listed unit, it is "only one stick of incense, and many gods have to be worshipped".
For a job content, it may be necessary to modify multiple versions of materials and submit them to different listing units.
A grass-roots netizen said that they had to report 5 apps separately for one job content, which increased a lot of workload.
Some grassroots cadres frankly said that they want to do well but are afraid to do well.
The factors behind the "listing" have caused ambivalence among grassroots cadres, which will naturally affect the overall work ecology at the grassroots level in the end.
In the final analysis, formalist bureaucracy is a human problem.
Therefore, in order to eradicate the "brand chaos", in addition to delisting, there must be "practical measures" to cooperate.
For example, the combination of "removing the brand" and "removing the hat" requires strict organizational handling and even disciplinary sanctions for those responsible for exposing formalism and bureaucracy; supervise and supervise the work responsibilities behind the "brand", To promote the real implementation of work, you cannot "get off the brand" and "no responsibility"; we must start the corresponding ideological and political education and work style education, let the pragmatic thinking take root and let the pragmatic style take root.
The work style of taking the mark of listing as actual performance and the mentality of "picking peaches" coveting the results of grass-roots work has led to the "brand chaos."
To eradicate the brand disorder, one should not only focus on the "brand", but should use this as an entry point and breakthrough point, and establish a long-term normal mechanism to eradicate the breeding ground for similar problems.
Otherwise, the "brand chaos", "App chaos" and "WeChat chaos" will be rectified, and it is difficult to guarantee that other formalism and bureaucratic manifestations will not appear.
Liao Dekai Source: China Youth Daily