<Anchor>



Today (18th), in the Gyeonggi State Audit, the key issue was who took how much money and how such a structure was possible for the Daejang-dong development project. We went beyond the level of conveying the workshop and examined whether the claims presented as evidence in the National Inspection were correct and what the facts were like at the time.



Reporter Kim Hyung-rae will tell you.



<Reporter>



A chart titled 'Profit Distribution in Daejang District' prepared by Gyeonggi Governor Jae-myung Lee.



Private revenue is 47.2 billion won and public revenue is 550.3 billion won.



It is the logic of this branch that the public returned more than half of the total revenue of Daejang-dong development.



[Lee Jae-myung/Governor of Gyeonggi-do: If the people did what the people wanted and the construction companies did what they wanted, 957.5 billion won would have been theirs. Still 60%. 550 billion (We recovered KRW)]



There is a blind spot in this explanation.



According to the Hwacheon Daewoo audit report, private investors not only earned 47.2 billion won from dividend income, but also earned at least 230 billion won from the sale of apartments.



In the end, it is also possible to argue that the private sector took more revenue than the public sector.



What was the situation in the real estate market when the project was designed in 2015?



The governor claims that the real estate market was not so good at that time that there were a lot of unsold houses, so Seongnam City was designed to obtain a stable fixed income.




On the other hand, the People's Power refutes that the real estate market in the metropolitan area was recovering at the time.



According to the statistics of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, for one year from March 2014, an average of 16,000 households were unsold in Gyeonggi-do every month.



However, during the same period, Gyeonggi-do's housing sales price index showed an upward trend from 76.7 to 78.2.



This is the point where the grounds of both sides are at odds.



Regarding the 'suspicion of paying attorneys' fees' in a case of violation of the Public Official Election Act, the governor said that six law firms were appointed for five trials, and 250 million won was transferred to the account.



[Lee Jae-myung/Governor of Gyeonggi-do: (Appointment of attorney) There are 4 individuals and 6 law firms.

The three former presidents of Minbyun did not participate in the pleadings in support of them but signed them…

.] When



I searched the website of the Supreme Court, the number of individual lawyers was 4, but there were 4 more law firms, 10.



Four attorneys from four corporations have been identified as officials of Minbyun.



The governor said that the Minbyun lawyers only submitted the seniority without participating in the pleadings, but the Minbyun side stated that the election law case is not officially subject to free pleading.



(Video coverage: Kim Heung-gi, video editing: Choi Hye-young)