China News Service, Beijing, October 15th. Title: The UN General Assembly resolution must not be distorted. The DPP’s search for an "international breakthrough" is doomed to fail

　　China News Agency reporter Rong Haisheng

　　In recent times, some people in the DPP authorities have repeated their old tunes and frequently voiced in the international media, claiming that the United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971 "has not resolved the issue of Taiwan’s representation in the United Nations," in an attempt to confuse the international community.

　　This is not the first time that the DPP authorities have misinterpreted Resolution 2758 of the UN General Assembly.

The Taiwan Affairs Office of the State Council and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs have repeatedly responded to their arbitrarily misrepresenting the spirit of Resolution 2758 and deceiving international public opinion, expressing their firm opposition.

　　The purpose of the DPP authorities misinterpreting Resolution 2758 is nothing more than to use it to once again speculate about the "application for membership", to expand the so-called "international space" for itself, and to create "one country on each side" across the strait.

This behavior cannot be justified.

　　In fact, Resolution 2758 adopted at the 1976 Plenary Session of the 26th United Nations General Assembly in 1971 has clearly "recognized that the representative of the Government of the People's Republic of China is the only legal representative of China in the United Nations."

According to the contents of the "Cairo Declaration" and "Potsdam Proclamation", Taiwan and the Penghu Islands are under the jurisdiction of China's sovereignty.

　　For many years, when dealing with issues involving Taiwan, the United Nations and related agencies have sought advice from the Office of Legal Affairs of the United Nations Secretariat.

The department’s opinion has clearly pointed out that according to UN General Assembly Resolution 2758, “The United Nations believes that Taiwan has no independent status as a province of China” and “Taiwan authorities do not enjoy any form of government status.” The title of Taiwan in the Secretariat documents must be used. "Taiwan, Province of China" (Taiwan, Province of China).

　　The DPP authorities turned a deaf ear to these historical facts and facts.

They are afraid they have forgotten that since the 1990s, Lee Teng-hui and Chen Shui-bian's authorities have successively tried to "participate", "return" and "join" the United Nations under various names such as "Republic of China" and "Taiwan". How did these political farces end?

The discerning person knows it at a glance.

　　The mainland attaches great importance to the wishes and concerns of Taiwan compatriots in participating in international activities.

As the spokesperson of the Taiwan Affairs Office of the State Council said in the speech, "Whether it is economic, social, cultural, sports activities, or health, epidemic prevention and anti-epidemic activities, we will do our best to make proper arrangements for Taiwan compatriots under the premise of the one-China principle. "

　　As the ruling party, the DPP authorities should have made long-term considerations for Taiwan's future.

If cross-strait relations are good, Taiwan will be good. This is the consensus of the vast majority of Taiwanese people.

Good cross-strait relations can only be achieved when the two sides of the strait recognize the one-China principle and the "92 Consensus" and continue to communicate and exchange views.

Do the DPP authorities really do not understand this truth, or are they pretending to be confused?

　　Previously, under the premise of agreeing with the one-China principle and the "92 Consensus", Taiwan successfully participated in the World Health Assembly (WHA) and the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) as an observer. Taiwan compatriots can not only participate in international activities, but also on the world stage. Demonstrating the demeanor of the Chinese.

　　Today, the DPP does not recognize the one-China principle and the "92 Consensus," but it attempts to unilaterally seek the so-called "international breakthrough", which is doomed to end in failure.

(over)