Not only academic awards, not a few years, no "hard leverage" in the thesis, 80 million people usher in major changes in the reform of professional titles——
Eclectic "evaluation" talents encourage performance and heroism
Our reporter Li Danqing
Without publishing a paper, Jiang Huasong, a teacher at Nanjing Forestry University, is still named a professor.
What he relied on was his teaching performance with good lectures and clear logic.
In the evaluation of professional titles in the past, the phenomenon of seniority ranking, "three thousand disciples is not as good as one essay" and other phenomena have been widely criticized.
Nowadays, the main reason for this phenomenon to be reversed is the series of professional title reforms carried out in recent years.
After 5 years, the key tasks of my country's professional title system reform have been completed, and the reform guidelines for the 27 professional title series have been released.
This reform involving approximately 80 million professional and technical personnel across the country has ushered in many major changes.
What exactly has the reform changed?
After the reform, how to carry out the evaluation of professional and technical talents?
Are there any changes in the evaluation criteria and scope of the evaluation?
Recently, the relevant person in charge of the Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security accepted an interview with our reporter to respond to social concerns.
The evaluation standard is more "quality"
Standards are the vane of talent development. To evaluate a talent is to set a benchmark.
With good standards, there will be an influx of talents.
According to the relevant person in charge of the Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security, the reform of the title system is guided by morality, ability, and performance, overcomes the tendency of only academic qualifications, qualifications, papers, and awards, and shifts from "quantity" to "quality", focusing on solving evaluation standards Simple quantification, "one size fits all" and other issues, give full play to the "baton" role of talent evaluation.
This reform insists on putting morality in the first place, advocating the spirit of science, strengthening social responsibility, and sticking to the bottom line of morality.
After the reform, each series of professional title reviews only set basic requirements for academic qualifications, and mainly compete for ability levels.
Translation, actor, computer software and other series or majors have no requirements for academic qualifications. Accounting, economics and other series will relax the starting point of education to high school.
In the engineering, agriculture, etc. series, those who do not have academic requirements can participate in the title review after being recommended by two or more experts in the industry.
"It should be said that academic qualifications are no longer an obstacle to participating in the evaluation of professional titles." The person in charge said.
At the same time, the performance has not been discussed for a few years.
After the reform, pay more attention to performance achievements and actual contributions, and judge heroes based on actual performance.
For scientific researchers, it mainly depends on whether the research results can "stand upright".
The evaluation of the clinical practice ability of the health professional and technical personnel is mainly emphasized, and the ability to see a doctor, the ability to see a doctor, and a good view are the main contents of the evaluation of the professional title of the clinical medical staff.
For all types of teachers, the main emphasis is on education and teaching ability and performance, and the quality of teaching is the main criterion.
There is no "hard leverage" in the thesis.
Change the one-sided practice of using the number of papers, patents, and funds as talent evaluation criteria.
For health professionals, design evaluation indicators related to clinical practice, clinical medical records, surgical videos, epidemiological investigation reports and other results can replace the requirements of the paper.
For researchers, emphasize the quality of papers and explore the implementation of a representative work system.
For college teachers, SCI, SSCI and other paper-related indicators are not used as the direct basis for preconditions and judgments.
Refine professional classification and scientifically evaluate talents
"This reform implements classified evaluation. Based on professional attributes and job requirements, the professional classification of talents is refined, and evaluation standards are scientifically formulated." The relevant person in charge of the Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security said.
The reporter learned that through reforms, college teachers will be divided into teaching-oriented, teaching and research-oriented, and teaching-oriented does not impose rigid requirements on papers.
In order to encourage scientific researchers to study key core technologies, especially the "stuck neck" problem, major scientific research projects with long research and development cycles, technical difficulties, and strong innovation are evaluated according to the value of individual contributions in the project.
The job title review insists on peer review and expert review.
According to the characteristics of different series and different industries, diversified evaluation methods are implemented.
At the same time, explore the introduction of social evaluation and market evaluation.
The lack of high-precision talents is a "key minority" in the talent team.
In the reform of the professional title system, there are special policies for special talents, no seniority ranking, and a green channel for professional title evaluation.
Let more professional and technical talents enjoy the reform dividend
Through reforms, the restrictions of household registration, region, identity, and files will be further broken, the scope of professional title appraisers will be expanded, and the channels for declaration of professional titles of various talents will be unblocked.
Professional and technical personnel in private enterprises account for more than half of the total number of professional and technical personnel in the country.
In 2020, the "Notice on Further Doing a Good Job in the Work of Professional Titles in Private Enterprises" was issued, clearly clearing the invisible threshold for private enterprise talents to participate in the evaluation of professional titles.
At the same time, establish a "overpass" for the career development of high-skilled talents and professional and technical talents.
The Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security has issued reform opinions twice to promote the professional development of high-skilled talents and professional technical talents, focusing on breaking the qualifications and status restrictions, and encouraging high-skilled talents to participate in the evaluation of professional titles, so as to achieve everything that should be done and can be done.
In addition, this reform also favors first-line professional and technical personnel in the fight against the epidemic, including anti-epidemic performance as a professional title evaluation index, and implements the "three priorities" for first-line professional and technical personnel in the fight against epidemics with priority in declaration, review, and appointment.