Chinanews.com, September 3, according to the official WeChat news of the Ministry of Ecology and Environment, the Ministry of Ecology and Environment recently forwarded the third batch of illegal clues found in the review of the 2020 environmental impact assessment documents to the ecological environment departments of Anhui, Jiangxi, Henan and other provinces for investigation and punishment according to law.

At present, the territorial ecological environment department has verified the relevant illegal clues, and the four EIA documents verified to have serious quality problems have been dealt with in accordance with Article 32 of the "Environmental Impact Assessment Law of the People's Republic of China" and related regulations. .

The 4 typical cases are:

1. Case of serious quality problems in environmental impact assessment documents for the project with an annual output of 6 million square meters of aluminum-plastic panels and new environmentally friendly building decorative panels of Fuyang City, Anhui Province, Yingbiao New Material Technology Co., Ltd.

  Upon investigation, its environmental impact report has plagiarized the "Environmental Impact Report of Anhui Chaoxing New Material Technology Co., Ltd.'s Annual Production of 50,000 Tons of High-Performance Plastic Pipe Project" and serious quality problems.

The project site in the two reports is different, but the environmental impact prediction is exactly the same as the exhaust cylinder coordinates given in the assessment chapter; the sound source is different and the layout is different, but the noise prediction results at the factory boundary are exactly the same.

  Fuyang Municipal Bureau of Ecology and Environment fined Hunan Zhiyuan Environmental Consulting Service Co., Ltd., the organization that prepared the environmental assessment, 135,600 yuan, confiscated 30,000 yuan of illegal gains, scored 10 points for untrustworthy Hunan Zhiyuan Environmental Consulting Services Co., Ltd., and punishable staff Ma Deqing and Li Ning. 20 points are scored for dishonesty, and the preparation of environmental impact assessment documents is prohibited within five years.

Criticize and educate the deputy director in charge of Jieshou City's Eco-Environment Branch, and order the person in charge of the ecological unit of Jieshou City's Eco-Environment Branch to make a written inspection to Fuyang City's Eco-Environment Bureau.

2. Case of serious quality problems in the environmental assessment documents for the construction project of the Jingbei Avenue gas station construction project of Sinopec Sales Co., Ltd., Jingdezhen Petroleum Branch of Jiangxi Jingdezhen City, Jiangxi Province

  After investigation, its environmental impact report form has plagiarized the "Sinopec Sales Co., Ltd. Jiangxi Poyang Petroleum Branch Dongxi Gas Station Reconstruction and Expansion Project Environmental Impact Report Form" behavior and serious quality problems.

The VOCs exhaust emissions in the two report forms are different, but the unorganized exhaust gas prediction parameters and results in the environmental impact analysis chapter are exactly the same.

Jingbei Avenue Gas Station signed an EIA technical service contract with Jingdezhen Yijing Environmental Monitoring Co., Ltd. (the company does not have a full-time environmental impact assessment engineer), which does not have the ability to prepare EIA documents, and Jingdezhen Yijing Environmental Monitoring Co., Ltd. subcontracts the contract to Henan Jinhuan Environmental Impact Assessment Co., Ltd.

  The Jingdezhen Municipal Ecological Environment Bureau has revoked the environmental assessment approval for the Jingbei Avenue gas station project, fined 75,000 yuan for the environmental assessment preparation unit Jingdezhen Yijing Environmental Monitoring Co., Ltd., and scored dishonest points for Henan Jinhuan Environmental Impact Assessment Co., Ltd. and Zhang Xin, the preparation host. 20 points, the preparation host Zhang Xin is prohibited from engaging in the preparation of environmental impact reports (forms) within five years.

3. Case of serious quality problems in the environmental impact assessment documents of Lingxia Reservoir Project in Yudu County, Ganzhou City, Jiangxi Province

  After investigation, its environmental impact report has serious quality problems.

The project did not carry out the monitoring of the current surface water quality during the dry season, and the prediction parameters of the water temperature prediction chapter in the project report did not match the actual situation of the project, directly applying the surface water environmental impact prediction and evaluation content of other projects.

  The Ganzhou Ecological Environment Bureau fined the construction unit Yudu County Yushan Water Affairs Co., Ltd. 500,000 yuan, and fined the environmental assessment preparation unit Guangzhou Yidi Environmental Protection Co., Ltd. 400,000 yuan. Yongyao made a circular and criticized and scored 10 points for dishonesty.

At the same time, the Administrative Approval Bureau of Ganzhou City intends to revoke the environmental assessment approval for the Lingxia Reservoir project.

Fourth, Xinxiang City, Henan Province, Duyin Wisdom Printing and Packaging Industrial Park Co., Ltd., a case of serious quality problems in environmental impact assessment documents for the construction project of 60,000 tons of paper products per year

  After investigation, the environmental impact report form has serious quality problems.

The report form did not propose effective prevention and control measures for the environmental pollution that may be generated by the construction project, and did not propose effective prevention and control measures for the hazardous waste and waste developer in the plate-making process.

  The Environmental Protection Bureau of Huojia County of Xinxiang City has revoked the environmental assessment approval of the project, and the Xinxiang City Ecological Environment Bureau fined Henan Duyin Wisdom Printing Packaging Industrial Park Co., Ltd. a fine of 920,000 yuan.

  In the next step, the Ministry of Ecology and Environment will continue to hand over relevant illegal clues to the local ecological environment departments, urge the local ecological environment departments to strictly investigate the fraud and serious quality problems of the environmental assessment, comprehensively strengthen the quality supervision of the environmental assessment documents, and form an effective deterrent to violations of laws and regulations.

Keywords: