(Fighting against New Coronary Pneumonia) Why is it necessary to investigate the origin of the virus in the United States?

Zhao Lijian gave seven reasons

　　China News Service, Beijing, August 27 (Reporter Liang Xiaohui) At a regular press conference on the 27th, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian gave seven reasons for why he should conduct a virus traceability investigation in the United States.

　　A reporter asked questions. According to reports, an anonymous senior official of the US government stated that China refused to provide the international community with access to information about the new crown epidemic.

He also stated that if there is a reliable and technically credible reason for an investigation by the United States, the United States will certainly support it, but there is no such reason.

What is China's comment?

　　Zhao Lijian said that traceability is a scientific issue, and China has always supported and will continue to participate in scientific traceability.

Some U.S. politicians and officials do not think about how to control the U.S. epidemic and save people’s lives. They vainly rely on an intelligence agency’s planted report to shirk their own responsibility for failure in the fight against the epidemic and blame China. They will only interfere with and undermine international traceability and global resistance. Epidemic cooperation.

The US claims that China has refused to provide the necessary information, which is just an excuse to cover up the failure of intelligence traceability.

　　Zhao Lijian said that since the U.S. has repeatedly claimed that as long as there are reasons, it supports the traceability investigation of the U.S.

Then please answer from the US:

　　First, the symptoms of a large-scale outbreak of e-cigarette pneumonia in Wisconsin in the United States in July 2019 are very similar to those of new coronary pneumonia. Is this a reason?

　　Second, the website of the National Institutes of Health of the United States shows that the study found that evidence of new coronavirus infection in the five states of the United States appeared in December 2019. Is this a reason?

　　Third, the U.S. government sealed up blood samples collected before January 2, 2020 and ceased investigation on the grounds of "interfering with traceability work and detrimental to U.S. national security. Is this a reason?"

　　Fourth, the Florida Department of Health website published data on 171 local patients who had symptoms of new crown pneumonia or tested positive for the new crown virus in January and February 2020. However, these data were inexplicably deleted. Is this a reason?

　　Fifth, there have been more than 200 people from the United States or countries closely related to the United States on Facebook and other social media. They publicly stated that as early as November 2019, they themselves or others had been infected with a disease suspected of being COVID-19. Is this a reason?

　　Sixth, 12 countries including Costa Rica, Kenya, etc. have publicly stated that the importing country of the "zero patients" of new coronary pneumonia in these countries is the United States. Is this a reason?

　　Seventh, Fort Detrick Base and the University of North Carolina both have a dark history and poor safety record in coronavirus research. The US Army Institute of Infectious Disease Medicine in Detburg was on the eve of the new crown outbreak in the fall of 2019. There have been serious safety incidents and was once stopped by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Is this a reason?

　　Finally, Zhao Lijian emphasized that since the U.S. firmly believes that it has no problems, please face the questions of the international community and invite the WHO to go to Fort Detrick and the University of North Carolina to conduct traceability investigations and disclose the original data of the early cases in the United States.

If the U.S. refuses to accept it, it will only further expose the true face of the U.S. politicizing the traceability.

(over)