The court dismissed the case for lack of evidence
A woman demands 50 thousand dirhams from her boyfriend for violations he committed in her car
The Abu Dhabi Family, Civil and Administrative Claims Court, rejected a lawsuit filed by a woman against her boyfriend, requesting that he be obliged to pay 50 thousand and 194 dirhams, the value of the violations he committed with her car during her loan to him, and the court indicated that the plaintiff did not provide evidence that the defendant was the only one who used the car. throughout the previous period.
In the details, an Asian woman filed a lawsuit against a man of her nationality, demanding that he pay her 50 thousand and 194 dirhams, and oblige him to pay fees and expenses, noting that the defendant is her friend, and that she lent him her personal car under the friendship relationship between them, and that he used it For necessity, the defendant committed violations of the car, including the amount of violations, 3775 dirhams, and the rest is a violation of 2,000 dirhams, leaving the house at the time of the curfew, and a violation of 40,000 dirhams, in which the defendant was caught transporting passengers. In addition to the amount of 2,740 dirhams for car maintenance, 600 dirhams for car insurance, 165 dirhams for vehicle inspection to renew ownership, and 1,380 dirhams for the translation of documents submitted to the court.
For its part, the court made it clear in the merits of its ruling, that the plaintiff must prove his right, and the defendant has the right to deny it, and the facts to be proven must be related to the case, productive in it, and acceptable, and the burden of proving the alleged right falls on the one who clings to it, referring to The papers are free of any evidence of the validity of what the plaintiff claims, that the defendant is the only one who used the car throughout the previous period, and that he committed the violations, and that he is the only beneficiary of the car, in addition to the correspondence provided by the plaintiff, claiming that it took place between her and The defendant is insufficient to prove this, and then the court decides to reject the case in its case, and the plaintiff is alone in resorting to the Public Prosecution to conduct an investigation regarding the violations committed by the car, which decided that these violations were recorded against the defendant, and the court ruled to reject the lawsuit in its case, and obligated the plaintiff to expenses.
• Violations were recorded against the defendant, and the court obligated the plaintiff to pay expenses.
Follow our latest local and sports news and the latest political and economic developments via Google news