On the issue of "recruitment" during the Pacific War, a South Korean court ruled this month to allow foreclosure and collection of goods that Korean companies would pay to Mitsubishi Heavy Industries.
However, the Korean company sent documents to the court stating that the business partner was not Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, but its group company, and the Korean lawyers who filed the complaint want to confirm the validity of the decision in the future. ..
In 2018, the Supreme Court of South Korea handed down a ruling ordering Mitsubishi Heavy Industries to compensate Korean women who allegedly had to work hard during the war.
In connection with this, the Korean district court will approve the foreclosure and collection of goods that Korean companies will pay to Mitsubishi Heavy Industries on the 12th of this month, about 850 million won, and about 80 million yen in Japanese yen. I made a decision.
However, the Korean company explained that "the business partner is not Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, but its group company," and on the 20th of this month, he mailed a statement stating the company name of the business partner to the district court.
Some South Korean media have also pointed out that the court may revoke the decision in the future, and the Korean lawyers who filed the complaint confirmed the validity of the decision through the contents of the statement and considered measures. I want to
The Japanese government has settled the issue of "recruitment" based on the Japan-Korea Claims Agreement of 1965, and has violated the Korean government, saying that the judicial procedure related to the judgment ordering compensation for Japanese companies is a violation of international law. Is seeking correction.