<Anchor>



The internal conflict in the ruling party is growing when Gyeonggi Governor Lee Jae-myung said he would consider giving everyone in Gyeonggi Province the disaster aid that was decided to receive only 88% of the people. In the opposition, former President Yoon Seok-yeol's so-called illegal food remarks were at the center of controversy.



Correspondent Han Se-hyeon.



<Reporter>



The start of the new conflict was the remarks of Gyeonggi Governor Lee Jae-myung.



In connection with the payment of disaster aid to the bottom 88% of income earners, which the ruling and opposition parties agreed to at the National Assembly last month, Gyeonggi Province announced that it would consider 'payment to all residents' on its own.



[Lee Jae-myung/Governor of Gyeonggi: 'I give 88%, but why don't I give it to 88.1%?', such protests are huge. Let our local government prepare it and pay it all, neatly… .] The



competitors were furious.



Former representative Nak-yeon Lee pointed out the issue of equity with other local governments, and



[Lee Nak-yeon/former Democratic Party Representative: How to

deal with equity with other local

governments that are trying to comply with the decision of the National Assembly... .]



Former Prime Minister Chung Sye-kyun criticized it as a 'one-way street' that does not respect the agreement between the National Assembly and the government.



[Jeong Sye-kyun/Former Prime Minister (CBS Radio): (Governor Jae-myung Lee) has never been in the National Assembly and never worked in the government. You don't have government experience. That's why I think he's probably making this decision.] In the



opposition, former Prosecutor General Yoon Seok-yeol's 'unclean food'The remarks came up late.



In a media interview last month, former President Yoon said, quoting the liberal economist Friedman's book 'Freedom to Choose', who advocated minimizing government intervention.



[Yoon Seok-yeol / Former Prosecutor General (Maeil Economic Daily Interview, 19th of last month): If you eat completely, really, people will get sick and die, but if you say 'unclean food', then people who don't have it can choose even lower and eat cheaper. This is what we should be able to do.]



Right now, the passports have been criticized as to whether it is possible to discriminately apply the basic rights of the people according to the rich and poor.



Former lawmaker Yoo Seung-min, a rival of the same party, also pointed out that "it violates the constitution of having the right to live a human life."




The former President Yoon's side explained that it was a absurd distortion and that it was a statement that was concerned about the administrative abuse that the abuse of criminal punishment would bring.



When I searched Friedman's book, I found a passage criticizing the government's control policy on low-quality, defective and dangerous goods and substances, saying that the prohibition law did not prevent drinking.



As to why he said 'unclean food', former President Yoon replied that he used the expression 'unclean food' to mean low-quality food.



(Video coverage: Park Jin-ho, Kim Seung-tae, Kim Yong-woo, video editing: Yu Mira)