The source of the new crown in the wrong direction: conspiracy to cover up science and politics to replace the truth

　　(International Review) The origin of the new crown in the wrong direction: Conspiracy to cover up science and politics to replace the truth

　　China News Service, Beijing, July 29th. Title: Tracing the source of the new crown in the wrong direction: Conspiracy to cover up science and politics to replace the truth

　　Author Zhang Huandi

　　The new coronavirus needs to be traced.

After the World Health Organization expert team went to China this year to jointly carry out a 28-day field study, it has reached important conclusions: the source of the new coronavirus is "very likely" from animals or nature; "very unlikely" is from laboratory leaks.

　　The source of the political virus must also be traced.

The United States has deviated from science and facts, politicized and stigmatized the traceability issue, and even aggressively coerced it, and unscrupulously interfered with international traceability research cooperation, which has already had a serious impact on international cooperation in the fight against the epidemic.

On related issues, a large number of internationally renowned experts and scholars have voiced their opposition to the politicization of the origin of the new crown, and emphasized the importance of "scientific leading the way."

　　Experts denounce the "laboratory leak theory" as unfounded

　　Peter Daszak, chairman of the American Ecological Health Alliance and a British zoologist, went to Wuhan this year to participate in the traceability research carried out by the WHO. He publicly denounced the "laboratory leak theory" on multiple occasions as groundless .

　　In an interview with CNN, Dazzak revealed: "We have been working with the Wuhan laboratory for 15 years. We know everything they do and have never seen their scientific researchers lie. (Wuhan laboratory) There has not been any'abnormal situation'." He emphasized: "Before the outbreak of the new crown, this virus did not exist in the laboratory in Wuhan."

　　Marion Koopmans, a Dutch virologist and WHO expert, questioned in an interview with the BBC: "The United States has continued to hype the'laboratory leak theory' for nearly a year. If there is real evidence, The United States has a responsibility to share it." She added: "I discussed the possibility of laboratory leaks with my colleagues, and the answer was written in black and white on the WHO report."

　　Adam Rogers, a science journalist at Wired magazine, pointed out sharply that the so-called "laboratory leak theory" is nothing more than a part of people using the uncertainty of science itself for political gain.

　　The scientific community widely agrees that the new crown comes from nature

　　Corresponding academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Director of the Laboratory of Bio-Nanotechnology, Microbiology and Virology of Novosibirsk State University, PhD in Biological Sciences Sergei Netesov reiterated in an exclusive interview with the Russian Satellite News Agency that so far, most experts and scholars have been It is believed that the new crown comes from nature.

　　Netesov bluntly stated that although there are many hypotheses about the source of the new crown, and conspiracy theorists have invented different versions, at present "most experts and scholars, not those keyboard virologists and long-tongue women in the market, believe that This (new crown) is a natural source." He emphasized that the most important thing now is to carefully analyze the disease itself.

　　Alexander Semyonov, director of the Yekaterinburg Institute of Virus Infection Science, Russia, also said: “The new crown virus comes from nature, and it is unreasonable and unprofessional to think that the virus is man-made.”

　　Russian virologist and WHO expert Lviv emphasized that most professionals have no doubt that the new crown virus originated in nature, and the so-called "man-made" is mostly from politicians, as Russian President Putin said: " The politicians have all turned into virologists."

　　Lviv also revealed that many WHO experts, including himself, are facing pressure from the United States, "These Americans do not want virologists to tell the truth about the epidemic."

　　Whose political tools have scientific issues become?

　　It is not difficult to see that the scientific community now has basic conclusions on the true source of the new crown. The hype of "laboratory leak theory" and other arguments are just some countries' attempts to politicize scientific issues.

　　Anthony Moretti, a professor at the School of Communication and Organization Leadership at Robert Morris University in the United States, once said that the scientific investigation has proved the impossibility of the "laboratory leak theory" very strongly, and continue to promote this lack of substance. The content theory is purely to meet the needs of the United States and Western countries to weaken China's global reputation.

　　Alexander Semenov also agreed with this view.

He said: "It is a pity that the study of the new crown involves too many political factors. In the current Sino-US relationship, the United States believes that it is more beneficial to blame China."

　　The traceability of the new crown is now and will be a scientific issue in the future.

The United States and Western countries selectively ignore the real evidence before them, hype the "laboratory leak theory" five times and three times, and repeatedly raise the traceability investigation of China again, just to use this to put pressure on China.

For them, on the issue of tracing the origin of the new crown, what really matters is not scientific facts, but the position of the supremacy of political interests.

　　I hope that the American and Western countries will one day understand what Einstein once said: Insane people will do the same thing over and over again, but expect different results.

(Finish)