[Joo Young-jin's News Briefing]
When citing an interview, please clearly state the program name 'SBS <Joo Young-jin's News Briefing>'. Copyright belongs to SBS.
■ Broadcast: SBS <News Briefing of Joo Young-jin> Mon-Fri (14:00~16:00)
■ Host: Joo Young-jin anchor
■ Interview: Yoo In-tae, former secretary general of the National Assembly
--------------- ---------------
"Song Young-gil's 'Great Kwaemun' remarks are meant to unite the party, but there seems to be a strong backlash"
" yijaemyeong, disappointed expression 'military occupation' ... 'prevailed' representation will have healed. "
" seemed a good idea to give up to move on to yunseokyeol, moderate, "
" Song Young-gil, urgently wateuna by the national interviewer test "
" gimhaeyoung interviewer Well done ... criticism care use I don't need it."
---
▷ Joo Young-jin/Anchor: Yoo In-tae, a former Democratic Party member, came out. Welcome to.
▶ In-Tae Yoo/Former Secretary General of the National Assembly: Hello?
▷ Young-Jin Joo/Anchor: Did you know that interim advertisements are a thing now?
▶ In-Tae Yoo/Former Secretary General of the National Assembly: Is that so?
▷ Young-Jin Joo/Anchor: Intermediate advertisements now appear on news programs as well. Then, a little while ago, Gyeonggi Governor Lee Jae-myung, former Prosecutor General Yoon Seok-yeol reported the role and character of the US military after independence from the Republic of Korea, and the remarks of Governor Lee Jae-myung that the American occupation forces and pro-Japanese forces established the Republic of Korea and that the start was not healthy. of criticism. How did you see it?
▶ In-Tae Yoo/Former Secretary General of the National Assembly: That's not what I said when I visited the Lee Yuk-sa Memorial Hall. Then, in the present-day Republic of Korea, probably many people will not be able to live for three generations if it is Liberation Day and congratulatory speeches are given. Actually, I had a bit of a relationship with it, but not everyone was properly educated, descendants of independence activists. And the reality of Korea is that there are many pro-Japanese forces among people who live well. So, in their first meeting, you are supposed to be the main characters in this liberated country, but they say that even if they are sorry for being treated badly and not receiving proper education in Korean society. So do I. If so. It should be like that in the country where you were liberated. That's what I think is common sense. So, the anti-civilian special committee was disbanded and the pro-Japanese minions the people who fought for our independence The police who used to torture us took on important positions in the police, those who served in the military in Japan, and all those who graduated from the Manchurian Military Academy took up important positions With what the world knows, so is Lee Jae-myung The governor made a slightly inappropriate remark a while ago.
▷ Youngjin Joo/Anchor: The expression is the same.
▶ In-Tae Yoo / Former Secretary General of the National Assembly: But the expression that he was the Soviet Liberation Army was not mentioned here.
▷ Young-Jin Joo/Anchor: The expression that the US military is an occupation force was the same.
▶ In-Tae Yoo / Former Secretary General of the National Assembly: Because they called themselves the occupation forces and occupation forces that way.
However, it would not have been much of a problem if a little pro-Japanese forces had gained power again during the US military government, and it would not have been a problem because it is a historical fact.
However, even if it was an occupation force, the expression itself occupied it at that time.
No, after the Second World War, they occupied everything, because this was also a territory.
So, and I am not saying that President Yoon Seok-yeol himself right now, but when I was asked whether I should join the power of the people or not, I wrote such an expression that I would link the middle way and post-progression like this in order to achieve overwhelming victory.
So, I was wondering how much of this midway was going to go, but I wondered if it was because it was the last declaration of political participation. Because of the press conference and this time, I felt that it would be better to give up on going to the midfield like this.
▷ Young-Jin Joo/Anchor: First of all, in the debate, former lawmaker In-Tae Yoo said that the story of Governor Jae-Myeong Lee was something many people think, and Seok-Yeol Yoon, this remark when considering the middle class and middle class, criticized Governor Jae-Myeong Lee. Seeing that, it would be better to give up. You took a critical approach. So let's talk about it like this, shall we? I think there are a lot of people who think the same as former Assemblyman Yoo In-tae said. However, even if they called the US military occupation forces, Koreans have thoughts about the role of the US military that entered Korea after independence at that time, and the role of the UN forces centered on the US military during the Korean War and the Korean War . At that time, if the US military keeps emphasizing the character of the occupation force, is it really a challenge to throw a debate over a historical issue, isn't it okay to not use that expression? How do you see it?
▶ In-Tae Yoo/Former Secretary General of the National Assembly: It is different from the UN military. It's the United Nations Forces, once the military administration was over and the government of the Republic of Korea was established, so they withdrew, but now the war broke out. You've occupied it everywhere, from the Allied side. So, it's an occupation force. And after the military administration and the establishment of our government, they withdrew later. So, the same thing is said because the pro-Japanese forces I mentioned earlier were working under the US military government, and then the military government was implemented. Because they conducted military administration in the occupied area. I don't know if that expression would have bothered our ears a little if it had been that way, but when I first came in, it was an occupation force until the military administration was officially implemented.
▷ Young-Jin Joo/Anchor: This is the occupation force. But on that part, former President Yoon Seok-yeol raises an issue.
▶ In-Tae Yoo/Former Secretary General of the National Assembly: They called themselves the occupation forces. expression. This is our occupied area. That's because it's not only in Korea, but all of the soldiers on the Allied side at that time went and occupied it.
▷ Young-Jin Joo/Anchor: I can understand what former lawmaker In-Tae Yoo thinks, but when the people hear such expressions, we think that Korean people have thoughts about the United States about the US military, but Governor Lee Jae-myung thinks something about it. Wasn't he talking about this? The perception of history is like that, but he doesn't back away from it. What I want to talk about is the part that the remnants of the pro-Japanese could not be liquidated, but about the part that the US military is an occupation force, the Korean people cannot agree with.
▶ In-Tae Yoo / Former Secretary General of the National Assembly: In the end, the pro-Japanese forces in the US gained power again under the US military government. It would have been better if I expressed it this way. I get that feeling.
▷ Youngjin Joo/Anchor: I see. Anyway, this issue is at the starting line of the current presidential election, and it is quite controversial, and it is a historical conflict.
▶ In-Tae Yoo/Former Secretary General of the National Assembly: As I said earlier, when I went to the memorial of Mr. Lee Yuk-sa and met with the bereaved family, the expression that I mentioned earlier about the occupation force may have been a little offensive, but they all talk like that. That's right. In fact, how much have they been treated badly in a liberated country?
▷ Youngjin Joo/Anchor: I also have to talk about this issue today, so I looked at this and that, but I also looked at the Anti-Civil Special Committee once again, and then I felt a bit sad again, at the time.
▶ In-Tae Yoo / Former Secretary General of the National Assembly: The anti-civil special committee disbanded and went with guns and knives, and almost everything they did was pro-Japanese police.
▷ Young-Jin Joo/Anchor: It's called Nodeok-Sul.
▶ Yoo In-tae/Former National Assembly Secretary General: Noh Deok-sul famous.
▷ Joo Young-jin/Anchor: The name of a pro-Japanese policeman appears.
▶ In-Tae Yoo / Former Secretary General of the National Assembly: I am not a person who was famous for that.
▷ Young-Jin Joo/Anchor: I think many people will agree about it, but even if the US military is called the occupation force, even if those people said so through the proclamation, how would it really be emphasized? Let’s watch the people’s judgment for a little bit in the future. I'll do it. I thought you wouldn't be able to come today, but you did.
▶ In-Tae Yoo/Former Secretary General of the National Assembly: Why can't I come?
▷ Young-jin Joo/Anchor: National Interviewer, National Interviewer of the Democratic Party, National Interviewer Kim Kyung-yul, who criticized Nak-yeon Lee, Se-kyun Jeong, and former Minister Cho Kuk, how can we review the same person as an interviewer, so I knew that former lawmaker In-tae Yoo did it. Eventually it changed again.
▶ In-Tae Yoo/Former Secretary General of the National Assembly: It was around lunchtime on Thursday or from Director Hoon-Sik Kang.
▷ Youngjin Joo/Anchor: Head of the competition planning team.
▶ In-Tae Yoo/Former Secretary General of the National Assembly: I'm not really interested in this lately, so I didn't know what the national interview was about or the event itself. But they asked me to take care of it, so who is doing it? So, I said earlier, Kim Kyung-yul and Kim Hae-young, and a young woman and three people. So, you were surprised that Rep. Kim Kyung-yul did it? Then he said that he had accepted it. So hey, if that's the case, it's going to be quite a hit. That's how I did it and I took the exam. When I first came there, I said that I didn't think there was a place for an old man to be there, but it came in the evening at lunchtime, and around 6 o'clock, CEO Song Young-gil urgently said that he had to do something. I was giving an exam, but I made an announcement and then there was a bit of a backlash because it was 3 people, so now I am in a hurry, but honestly, I was playing the evening game at that time and I am immersed in it.
▷ Joo Young-jin/Anchor: Song Young-gil, CEO.
▶ In-Tae Yoo/Former Secretary General of the National Assembly: So, anyway, saying that I knew it ended up being accepted, but when I saw it, there was a backlash, so it was like saying that I was a replacement member, and I did not know that it was going to Cheongju because of the shape. the event itself. So, I already said it was hot, but I said to cancel the event, but I told Director Kang Hoon-sik. And I said I'm not going, so I called the next Friday morning.
▷ Young-Jin Joo/Anchor: So, it seems that Kim Hae-Young's former best has been added again.
▶ In-Tae Yoo/Former Secretary General of the National Assembly: No, it was originally there.
▷ Joo Young-jin/Anchor: Kim Hae-young was the original member.
▶ In-Tae Yoo / Former Secretary General of the National Assembly: Originally Kim Kyung-Yul, Kim Hae-Young Another Kim What?
▷ Youngjin Joo/Anchor: Soyeon Kim.
▶ In-Tae Yoo / Former Secretary General of the National Assembly: Anyway, there are three people. There are three of them, but among them, former lawmaker Kim Hae-young was the one who was appointed from the beginning, and two more people were recruited.
▷ Young-Jin Joo/Anchor: Hae-Young Kim, the former best What did you think of yesterday's question?
▶ In-Tae Yoo / Former Secretary General of the National Assembly: They say you are doing well. So it was good that I didn't go again. They are all good at everything my age, but like Kim Hae-young, I can do it, if I participated.
▷ Young-Jin Joo/Anchor: Candidate Mi-ae Chu is not fair because she says that former lawmaker Hae-Young Kim is coming. He was a critic of the country's situation, but he raised the issue again like this.
▶ In-Tae Yoo / Former Secretary General of the National Assembly: It seems that I was also included in the interrogation police Ahn Jong-beom. I've heard that comments have been posted for a while.
▷ Joo Young-jin / Anchor: Jeong Cheong-rae is the best before Kim Hae-young, and don't wear armbands again. I also wrote a commentary on this.
▶ In-Tae Yoo / Former Secretary General of the National Assembly: He is also a friend who is almost the same. A friend you don't have to worry too much about.
▷ Young-Jin Joo/Anchor: Former Assemblyman In-Tae Yoo, every time you talk like this, I feel a little embarrassed. What will Congressman Chungcheong-rae think when he sees this show again?
▶ In-Tae Yoo/Former Secretary General of the National Assembly: It seems like what I usually do.
▷ Young-Jin Joo/Anchor: Young-Gil Song, CEO of the Kwan-Hun Club, discussed earlier. He himself talked about the so-called Daekaemun. Strong supporters of President Moon Jae-in. It is better to become the opposition party than to become Governor Lee Jae-myung. The moment you think like this, you will not be able to protect President Moon Jae-in. What do you think?
▶ In-Tae Yoo / Former Secretary General of the National Assembly: I do not support the opposition, but I abstain. In that case, unless our candidate is terrifying. So, in the end, as representatives, we agreed to the result and the party was united, didn't we say it with this purpose?
▷ Young-Jin Joo/Anchor: Is there any possibility that those remarks will become controversial?
▶ In-Tae Yoo / Former Secretary General of the National Assembly: There will be some backlash from Kang-Sung's friend.
▷ Young-Jin Joo/Anchor: Unification of Candidates Kwang-Jae Lee and Se-Kyun Jeong We also expected that Candidate Sye-Kyun Jeong would eventually become candidate, but Kwang-Jae Lee seems to be conceding. Now, candidate Lee Nak-yeon also said that he would join us.
▶ In-Tae Yoo/Former Secretary General of the National Assembly: What do you do together?
▷ Youngjin Joo/Anchor: I said that I agree with the spirit of unification.
▶ In-Tae Yoo / Former Secretary General of the National Assembly: After all, there is a final.
▷ Youngjin Joo/Anchor: Will it be natural?
▶ In-Tae Yoo / Former Secretary General of the National Assembly: No, in the finals, there will be only two people left, right? Then there is no need to unify like now. When there is no wiring, the original is unified. There is a connection, but there is no need to unify.
▷ Young-Jin Joo/Anchor: In the finals, however, 1st place candidates must not have a majority. If there is a majority, there is no final.
▶ In-Tae Yoo / Former Secretary General of the National Assembly: That's right. No, I mean, can the 2nd and 3rd place unite and do it before the finals and before the finals to block the majority? People who recruited the national electoral college each other don't do it their way. There, when we were doing our candidate Park Young-sun and Park Won-soon.
▷ Youngjin Joo/Anchor: During the 2011 Seoul mayor by-election.
▶ In-Tae Yoo/Former Secretary General of the National Assembly: During the 2011 by-election. Even then, I applied like this and went. I also told my children that I was Park Young-sun, the party candidate, and told them to go and buy dinner for them, but they went and filmed Park Won-soon for their crimes.
▷ Joo Young-jin/Anchor: You can't do it your way?
▶ In-Tae Yoo/Former Secretary General of the National Assembly: No, that's it.
▷ Young-Jin Joo/Anchor: I think most would agree with the trend that Candidate Jae-Myung Lee is starting out ahead of time anyway. Will there be a majority at the end? Candidate Jae-myung Lee will eventually win, at this point.
▶ In-Tae Yoo/Former Secretary General of the National Assembly: I don't really want to talk about election predictions.
▷ Young-Jin Joo/Anchor: Candidate Jae-Myeong Lee leads anyway.
▶ In-Tae Yoo / Former Secretary General of the National Assembly: Well, it will be ahead.
▷ Youngjin Joo/Anchor: I see.
▶ In-Tae Yoo/Former Secretary General of the National Assembly: It's not going to collapse easily because I've been through enough.
▷ Young-Jin Joo/Anchor: Are there any candidates that former lawmaker In-Tae Yoo also supports in your heart?
▶ In-Tae Yoo/Former Secretary General of the National Assembly: Me? I'm cheering you all on
▷ Youngjin Joo/Anchor: Yes.
▶ In-Tae Yoo/Former Secretary General of the National Assembly: Yes?
▷ Youngjin Joo/Anchor: Is there?
▶ In-Tae Yoo/Former Secretary General of the National Assembly: No, no, nothing in particular.
▷ Youngjin Joo/Anchor: I see. I think you will probably tell me when things are sorted out to some extent. I will listen to you today.
(SBS New Media Department)