Eni-Nigeria case, prosecutor Storari at the Brescia Public Prosecutor's Office: "I shouldn't have touched Amara"

2021-06-18T04:53:22.527Z

Piero Amara should not have 'touched' the investigations because he had to be summoned to the Eni-Nigeria trial and the investigations on the slander profiles for his statements on the Hungary lodge had to remain firm in order not to compromise him as witnesses. This is in summary what the prosecutor of Milan Paolo Storari reported to the Brescia prosecutor who investigated him for disclosure of office secrecy for having delivered the minutes of the lawyer to the CSM to protect himself from the "inertia" of the top management of his office. Storari would have said that for the same reasons Vincenzo Armanna, the great accuser at the trial, would have been preserved. More papers are coming The documentation is awaited at the Prosecutor's Office in Brescia, requested with acquisitions in various offices, as part of theinvestigation in which the deputy prosecutor of Milan Fabio De Pasquale and the prosecutor Sergio Spadaro are under investigation for refusal of official documents in relation to the trial on the Eni / Shell-Nigeria case and to the management of the accused and great 'accuser' Vincenzo Armanna. Investigation that also led the Ministry of Justice to move promptly through the inspectorate with the request for documents "in order to correctly reconstruct the facts". Among the various papers requested by the public prosecutor Francesco Prete, as well as to the directly concerned, whose PCs were also the subject of a search, and to the prosecutor Paolo Storari who, questioned twice in the last month, reported the anomalies,there are also the reasons for the sentence with which the Court acquitted all the defendants for the Nigerian affair. Sentence to which the president of the college of the seventh criminal section Marco Tremolada would also have attached a note to protect himself in relation to the initiative carried out during the trial by the two prosecutors, who asked to have Piero Amara enter as witnesses in the trial. Without, however, informing the judges that in the meantime a passage of one of his minutes had been forwarded to his colleagues from Brescia, at the beginning of 2020, which cast serious 'shadows' on Tremolada himself. The dossier was archived in Brescia. Regarding, however, what De Pasquale and Spadaro argued in a note sent to the Milan prosecutor Francesco Greco on March 5 of this year and in recent days to the Brescia prosecutors,to express their "critical" evaluations on the evidence on Armanna collected by Storari, it appears that these were not "informal" acts, as defined by the two prosecutors. In particular, the report of the investigators in which there was also talk of chat 'manipulated' by the former manager of Eni and which in any case showed a payment of 50,000 dollars to Isaac Eke, summoned to the court as witnesses to confirm his accusations, would have in reality it had all the characteristics of officialdom. The Ministry of Justice launches an administrative investigation The Ministry of Justice has launched an administrative investigation into the Eni-Nigeria trial. After the dissemination of news about theregistration in the register of suspects by two prosecutors of the Milan Public Prosecutor's Office and in light of the filing of the reasons for the sentence of the Milan Court, the Ministry asked the inspectorate to carry out preliminary investigations, in order to correctly reconstruct the facts, through the acquisition of the necessary documents.