• Eni: storm in the Milan prosecutor's office, two prosecutors investigated in Brescia

  • Amara Dossier: from the "false conspiracy" Eni-Nigeria the start of the clash between the Milan prosecutors

  • Davigo: "I didn't disclose Amara's minutes, whoever thinks it is crazy"

  • Csm, Storari to pm Rome: Amara interrogation reports delivered to Davigo in Milan

  • CSM, Brescia prosecutor opens file on Amara's minutes

  • Secreted minutes and Masonic lodge: the dossier is investigated with the depositions of the lawyer Amara

  • Palazzo dei Marescialli: the CSM will be the offended party in the investigation of the prosecutors on Amara minutes

Share

June 11, 2021 In the proceedings of the Brescia prosecutors' investigation, in which the deputy De Pasquale and the prosecutor Spadaro are accused of refusing official documents for not having deposited evidence in the trial on the Eni-Nigeria case, there are also some emails, sent by the prosecutor Paolo Storari at the top of the office, in which the magistrate pointed out the unreliability of the former Eni manager Vincenzo Armanna.



The prosecutor, questioned in May in Brescia, would have put pen to paper that hearing the former executive still on the record would have been harmful to the investigation into the 'false Eni plot', which he owned together with the adjunct Laura Pedio. 



For prosecutor Storari, Armanna - valued instead by De Pasquale and Spadaro as the 'great accuser' in the Eni-Nigeria trial - was actually unreliable and indeed, hearing him still in the minutes in the other file on the 'false Eni conspiracy', would only have damaged the investigation.



The Brescia investigation, coordinated by the prosecutor Francesco Prete and the prosecutor Donato Greco, was born precisely from the interrogations of the public prosecutor Storari, also investigated in Brescia but for revelation of the secret of office, since, when he had joined the adjunct Pedio in the investigations into the so-called 'Eni misdirection', in April 2020 he had delivered, for self-protection, the reports returned by Piero Amara to Piercamillo Davigo, then to the CSM.



Storari explained that he had sent De Pasquale and Spadaro - copying Pedio and the prosecutor Francesco Greco - material that allegedly demonstrated how Armanna, a former manager fired by the oil company and enhanced by the accusation in the debate on the Nigerian field, had built false evidence to "throw mud" on the top of the group and then blackmail them. Material that the two prosecutors did not make available to the defenses and the Court during the trial despite being aware, this is the hypothesis, of the false accusations.



The omissions concern a series of chats altered by the former manager to discredit not only the CEO Claudio Descalzi but also the head of staff Claudio Granata. And other 'purified' messages to hide an alleged payment of 50 thousand dollars to Isaac Eke, witness called to the court by the prosecution. In the proceedings of the Brescia investigation there are the emails sent by the prosecutor Storari at the top of the office, in particular between the last months of 2020 and the beginning of 2021. The judges of the Eni case also expressed themselves on the unreliability of Armanna. Nigeria in the reasons for the sentence with which the 15 defendants were acquitted.