- I think that the Court of Appeal has made an incorrect assessment.
They have said, obviously after some agony, that robbery can only be proven and not aggravated robbery.
They have taken the somewhat cautious route, but despite that, the Court of Appeal has still added the penalty value to the minimum sentence for aggravated robbery, so it is clear that it must just be in a border position, he says.
Does not affect prosecution of the other robber
On Monday, May 24, the district court proceedings will begin against the man suspected of being the other robber.
The 24-year-old man is charged with, among other things, aggravated robbery, but chamber prosecutor Kjell Janneson does not consider that the judgment of the Court of Appeal affects his starting point in that case.
- I mean it does not matter.
We know there are two perpetrators.
The Court of Appeal has also come to this conclusion, but the perpetrators do slightly different things.
I claim that the man who is now being prosecuted has done much more.
He is the one who is down and empties the cash registers and constantly threatens the main target owners, he says.
He believes that the defense will refer to the judgment of the Court of Appeal, that it is a robbery and not a serious robbery.
Although he believes that the defense will first and foremost claim that the 24-year-old was not at the scene.
But according to the prosecutor, it is he who is seen in the surveillance films and he who had the knife.
Satisfied with parts of the verdict
Although the prosecutor Kjell Janneson thinks that the Court of Appeal has made an incorrect assessment when it comes to the prison sentence, there are also parts of the sentence he is satisfied with.
- I am pleased that he is held accountable and that the attachment that I requested will also remain.
This means that there is a possibility that the plaintiffs can receive the damages.
I'm happy with that, he says.
The detention means that they have taken property worth SEK 1,290,000 from the 31-year-old in custody.