[Hyunjun Go's News]
<Anchor>
It's time for current affairs critic Hyun-Jun Go's news.
Shall we look at the first news today (10th)?
<Hyun-Joon Ko/Presentation Critic> The
first news came from the United States. A legislator in the United States was driving a car, pretending not to be, and attending a videoconference before being hit by public opinion.
On the 3rd, US senators from Ohio are having a videoconference.
The man in the white top is Republican Senator Brenner.
There's a sofa, and there's a picture frame, so at first glance you might think it's a home, but the problem was the seat belt across the chest.
In order to hide the fact that I attended the video conference while driving, I changed the wallpaper as if I were at home, but I could not even hide the appearance of the seat belt of the vehicle.
Moreover, as I was moving, the background screen was broken momentarily, and the scenery outside the car window was caught on the screen for a moment.
When it was revealed that he was attending a meeting while driving, Congressman Brenner explained that he was looking ahead, and unfortunately, the meeting was a place to deliberate on a bill banning the use of electronic devices such as mobile phones while driving.
This is not the first time in the United States attending a videoconference while driving has been controversial, but last month a Washington state lawmaker apologized for participating in a videoconference while driving.
<Anchor> If
you look at a program called Zoom, there is a function to change the background screen, but it feels like I was stuck with a trick. But in Korea, we have been doing a lot of video conferencing recently. Even in Korea, fines are imposed for doing anything else while driving, right?
<Ko Hyeon-jun/Sisa Critic>
That's right. As you may know, using only a mobile phone while driving can result in fines or penalties, especially in the case of video calls, so it is pointed out that driving with your eyes closed because it distracts your eyes. It's a very dangerous behavior.
<anchor>
I really shouldn't do it. right. What is the second news?
<Ko Hyun-jun / Current affairs critic>
Next news.
Three leopards escaped from a zoo in China, but they were not informed in time, causing controversy.
Three young leopards escaped a week ago from the Hangzhou Wildlife Park in China.
Nevertheless, the zoo did not inform the surrounding private houses or visitors of this fact, but this was revealed when local residents reported that a leopard appeared to be roaming.
When the authorities investigated, the zoo mobilized Buryaburya search dogs to mobilize the leopards, but only two out of three were caught and one of them was still unknown.
What surprised people even more was the explanation from the zoo, which was being investigated by the authorities, "Because they are young leopards, they have weak aggression, so I thought it would not be very dangerous, and I decided not to announce it in case it would cause useless fear."
Chinese netizens poured out criticism, saying,'Can a leopard be treated as a cat because it is young?'
<Anchor>
It is deserving that such criticism comes out because I really hear the clarification.
I feel like this.
What is the last news today?
<Ko Hyeon-jun/Sisa Critic>
Three years ago, a woman's family members who had died after
investing
in the Han River changed their minds and made a request to 119 for rescue, but finally filed a lawsuit against the fire department, and the result was lost.
In the early morning of November 2018, a call came to the Seoul Metropolitan Disaster Prevention Center asking for rescue, saying,'I have committed myself to the Han River, but I am alive.'
However, an agent from the general control room who received the call at the time asked Mr. A's call to report, "Will you jump or jump off?" and "It's amazing to see the phone call while swimming in the Han River." It was revealed that he was sneaky while not doing it.
A rescue team arrived late and searched the scene of the accident, but did not find Mr. A. Eventually, three days later, Mr. A was found dead in the Han River.
Mr. A's father suspicious of his daughter's report as a prank phone call and filed a claim against the fire department for damages. The court admitted that relief measures were insufficient, but saw no liability for compensation.
Mr. A had already lost consciousness because the phone was disconnected during the call, and considering the speed of the current, it was difficult to determine the location, so even if he was dispatched immediately, it is highly likely that Mr. A died.