The West's position on terrorism has been contradicted in Turkey

Turkish Interior Minister Suleiman Soylu was present on a TV program last week, during which he presented documents and evidence indicating that a member of parliament for the HDP secured the enrollment of a Kurdish youth in a terror camp, but this matter is not strange to HDP members, as the relationship The document between the HDP and the PKK is well known in Turkey.

Therefore, the aim of Suleiman Soylu's documentation of this matter was not to convince the Turkish public opinion, but rather to reveal the extent of the contradiction in the American and European position regarding terrorism in Turkey.

Suleiman Soylu revealed once again to everyone that the HDP, its members, headquarters and mayors are like units to recruit fighters for the PKK and finance its activities.

These documents also show how Europe turned a blind eye to the HDP's financial and logistical support for terrorism, in exchange for criticizing the state's decision to appoint new officials to head the municipalities in which the HDP won in fair elections.

It is no longer possible to conceal the relationship between these two entities, especially in light of the demands of mothers, the HDP officials in Diyarbakir, to return their children who were kidnapped by the PKK and taken to its camps in the mountains.

All these children were taken to the headquarters of the HDP before joining the ranks of the PKK in the mountains.

Is Noureddine detained by the terrorist organization or is he one of the officials involved in kidnapping thousands of innocent Kurdish children to the mountains?

The message of this mother from Diyarbakir highlights an unambiguous contrast.

The HDP, which is supposed to be a political party, is involved in the recruitment process for the terrorist Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK).

They ignore the cries of terror of about 200 families throughout this period, while they seek freedom for Saladin Demirtaş, who is accused of inciting violence and spreading hate speech that has killed 55 people.

Some people may think that he is being detained because of his opinions, opposition, or political ideas, but the reason behind his imprisonment is his support for the terrorist organization that has claimed hundreds of lives.

This charge is proven by evidence and evidence.

In response to Salah al-Din Demirtaş’s mother’s demand for the release of her son, one of the mothers who had been kidnapped by the HDP and handed over to the PKK said, “Saladin Demirtaş is imprisoned in the state prison because of the accusations against him. The PKK without any protection or guarantees, instead of demanding the release of Saladin Demirtaş, who enjoys his full rights under the laws of the state.

Is Noureddine detained by the terrorist organization or is he one of the officials involved in kidnapping thousands of innocent Kurdish children to the mountains?

The message of this mother from Diyarbakir highlights an unambiguous contrast.

Perhaps the most prominent aspect of this black comedy is the vulgar contradiction between the party’s apparent call to renounce violence and the demand for freedom and democracy in exchange for its practice of violence and fascism.

These claims serve the interests of his allies in the United States and the European Union who want to promote it as a party fighting for salvation and freedom.

In fact, PKK terrorism does not target people only, but also the word, the idea and the minds.

The HDP's singing of democracy, rights and freedom conceals behind it the fascist practices that have become a regular culture in which all these buzzwords that they rave about all the time have no place.

One of the symptoms of the problem is the proliferation of the PKK in praising democracy, to which the saying "Too much talk obscures the meaning" applies to him in this case.

This exaggeration in talking about democracy conceals a lot of lies, and the more they talk about democracy, the farther away they are.

This party used to glorify democracy until it proposed to Turkey the exercise of autonomy, but this party, which claims to present a more democratic model of governance, applies practices that contradict this on the ground.

He permits himself to dismantle civilian homes, dig trenches in the heart of cities, train for war for months, and disrupt the course of life in it, while the lives of its residents turn into hell.

However, in international forums, they call all these practices "restoring sovereignty in the face of tyranny."

A questioner may ask: What kind of democratic procedures the PKK followed when applying these abusive practices?

Have he proposed to the people a referendum on going to war against the state?

Did he get approval from them before digging the trenches?

Does violating the sanctity of homes, demolishing their walls, and making corridors, bunkers and ammunition stores in them, involve the participation of the people in the democratic phase?

There is no doubt that these practices and violations by the PKK have nothing to do with democracy, the foundations of autonomy, or politics, and were dominated by nothing but violence.

Those who criticize today the state’s replacement of mayors that the HDP won, overlook the fact that the PKK interferes in their work and influences their decisions, as funds and efforts are devoted to recruiting fighters.

Turkey has long fought against terrorism and protected democracy by its right to defend itself against these threats.

Therefore, instead of leaving the mayors appointed by the terrorist organization, the state has appointed other people to work to run the municipalities in a framework that serves the interest of the people who fund them.