China News Service, Beijing, March 4th. Zhu Fenglian, spokesperson for the Taiwan Affairs Office of the State Council, said on the 4th that the cross-strait webcast exchange activities provide a very good opportunity for young Taiwanese who are interested in entrepreneurship and employment development in the e-commerce live broadcast industry, and build a dream for them. The stage, sharing development opportunities with them, is well received by Taiwanese youth.

  Regarding Taiwan’s security department, the mainland has carried out so-called “cognitive warfare” against Taiwan by holding cross-strait live broadcast competitions and training for Taiwanese youth anchors to gain recognition from Taiwanese people. Zhu Fenglian said that we have always actively supported and encouraged people on both sides of the strait, especially youths, to strengthen exchanges. , Enhance understanding and develop together.

  Zhu Fenglian said that in 2020, the online live broadcast industry represented by e-commerce live broadcasts will flourish and become an effective way to stimulate economic internal circulation.

As of December 2020, the number of online live broadcast users in mainland China has reached 617 million, of which e-commerce live broadcast users have reached 388 million.

  She pointed out that a Taiwanese youth said frankly, "In the new media industry, the mainland has a mature short video platform and a relatively complete industrial chain. I hope that with the help of relevant exchange activities, I can better penetrate this industry and develop my own business."

  Zhu Fenglian emphasized that out of the selfishness of one party, the DPP authorities are afraid that compatriots on both sides of the strait will come closer, and that the people of Taiwan will understand the true situation of the mainland. Based on their "independence" nature, they will conduct malicious operations and deliberately obstruct or destroy compatriots on both sides of the strait. It is unpopular for Taiwan’s youth to obtain more and better development opportunities for their legitimate rights and interests.

The answer is clear at a glance who is thinking about Taiwan’s youth and who is destroying the development prospects of Taiwan’s youth.