The motive behind writing these lines is news reported by the French and European media starting Thursday January 21 2021, according to which French President Macron has promised to allocate a significant budget to work on developing the "quantum computer" (Quatum computer), in order to maintain, According to him, France and Europe are in the competition, along with the two giants, America and China.

This news calls for more than a pause.

It is, in the beginning, evidence of the existence of an anticipating mind trying to look into the mysterious distant;

This insight enabled him to realize the growing role of technology in achieving leadership in the world of tomorrow.

This is from one side, and on the other hand.

The news relates to a technological innovation with specific specifications that should be considered.

The quantum computer he is talking about is not only a new technological tool;

Rather, it is an innovation whose completion is required to transcend the principles of traditional logical reason, and to adopt the principles of modern physics.

If the Industrial Revolution, as it is said, enabled man to transcend the limits of his physical, muscular strength, as one individual, thanks to one small machine, was able to lift from the weights that tens, rather hundreds of individuals were unable to lift together;

The technological revolution that is unfolding in our reality today, thanks to artificial intelligence, will enable man to cross the limits of his mental strength in interacting with the cosmic reality in an intelligent interaction, whether at the level of understanding and understanding this reality, or at the level of influencing and changing it.

Before detailing the topic of new technological innovations, in relation to the principles of reason, it is imperative to point out the role of these innovations in establishing the balance of power and drawing the features of tomorrow's geo-strategic world.

The current global reality is witnessing a great disparity between 3 types of societies in terms of awareness of the importance of technology and the ability to join their new system.

We understand from the words of the French President that the United States of America and China are at the top of the list of excelling in the technological expertise necessary to lead the world, and we also understand from his words that France and its counterparts do not despair of joining the ranks of these distinguished students.

And we can deduce from the context of the speech the existence of a third category that is silent, namely, the class of societies unable to join the ranks of technology.

Societies that do not aspire, either due to subjective or objective circumstances, to employ technological innovation for the purpose of proving oneself in the world of tomorrow.

We conclude from this introduction to a reflection on the reality of technology today and the amazing developments it boasts.

Here we can only admit to every one who says that we are facing a revolution that abstains from everything that came before it, and prevents the perception of what may be after it, a revolution that will have a greater impact on human history than the industrial revolution.

If the Industrial Revolution, as it is said, enabled man to transcend the limits of his physical and muscular strength, as one individual, thanks to one small machine, was able to lift from the weights that tens, but rather hundreds of individuals together, could not lift;

The technological revolution that is unfolding in our reality today, thanks to artificial intelligence, will enable man to cross the limits of his mental strength in interacting with the cosmic reality in an intelligent interaction, whether at the level of understanding and understanding this reality, or at the level of influencing and changing it.

When we contemplate the conditions of our contemporary world, this leads us to say that modern technological innovations that have expanded the visual field of vision have expanded the same field of mental proof.

There is no doubt that the tremendous technological development that has occurred has enabled the eye to look in the dark thanks to infrared rays, and to penetrate the veils to look beyond objects thanks to ultrasound, and then to look into the past by means of measuring the temperature of objects through the trace left behind ... there is no doubt This development has a major role in enabling the human mind to comprehend and understand the perceived reality after dissecting it and deconstructing it into infinitesimal partial elements.

It is known that a person was and still is inclined to believe that the proof is stronger with the “definite” truth, or that which is before the eye.

This is indicated by some aphorisms, such as our saying, "He who hears is not like he saw," or "The news is not like the one who sees."

The truth before the eye is more eloquent in describing reality and is able to penetrate into its depth than other facts, on top of which is the heard or transmitted truth.

However, the time for a specific truth is narrower than the time for other facts.

Do you not see that the specific event does not happen soon after the eye until it disappears and disappears, to become a trace after an eye as it is said?

And then it turns into news that the tongues read and listen to it ceaselessly.

With this shift from event to news, the area of ​​proof narrows and the arena of debate about truthfulness, falsehood, error and correctness expands.

With the technological development, the perceived reality is no longer just a fleeting moment, which viewers, each from their own point of view, differ in their rationalization.

When we look at the video technology adopted to assist the referees in managing football matches, for example, we find that technology has come to allow "reality display" again to find out the truth of what happened.

After the transient event was related to the moment of its occurrence and its occurrence, a moment in time that does not return, today, thanks to photographic techniques, scenes and scenes have no connection with their time of occurrence, but rather different times, times of re-presentation and reading.

The technique of photography has enabled the person to "turn around" the facts and events, about what happened and the time of his run-off, after he had previously only turned his gaze on inanimate objects, examining them from different "angles of view".

Looking at the aspects of technological development taking place today calls us to acknowledge the inability to realize the limit on which the impact of smart digital technology stands.

There is no doubt that this shift - from the ability to look at the static thing to the ability to turn it around in moving things - has great repercussions, the least of which is the reflection on human behavior.

Man has become, knowing that his movements, like his dwellings, have become fixed in a record of images that can be opened at every moment. He has become cautious about the actions he comes, so he chooses what is appropriate from them and leaves what is not appropriate.

This is on the grounds that the greatest reflection of this transformation is in its depth a reflection on the structure of the classical logical mind, especially on the ways that this mind represents what things are.

The expansion of the functions of the sense of sight, thanks to technological innovations, has led to an expansion of the horizon of the intellectual and philosophical view.

The mind is no longer satisfied with asking what it is, asks for an answer to the reality of a thing in a state of stagnation, such as asking, for example, "What is the world?"

Rather, while turning his gaze on the movement of things, he began asking another question related to the reality of the thing in the event of its movement and flow, such as asking, for example, “What is the world doing?”, And the difference between the two questions and the answers that the mind gives it.

Researching the aspects of technological development taking place today calls us to acknowledge the inability to realize the limit on which the impact of smart digital technology stands.

This technology, which has become expanding the field of intelligence to draw the features of a new human mind.

Technology has reached a development that enabled the machine to learn (Deep learning), and became more able to distinguish between objects after they were only transferred and photographed.

It suffices for this machine to distinguish between two sheets of leaves of a type of tree, so that it proceeds to classify each new leaf presented to it according to its precise characteristics that distinguish it from the other classified leaves, and this to no end.

This may seem normal at first glance;

However, in its depths, it indicates a major turning point in the history of the human mind.

Thanks to the ability of the super-machine to extrapolate and distinguish between variables, the scientific system enters a new stage with which the field of the micro is expanding at the expense of the total.

Medicine, for example, will tend to deal with individual cases, more than its previous dealing with general phenomena.

The doctor, in front of what technology provides in terms of the superior ability to collect information about the patient and speed up its treatment, has become able to look at a set of relationships that he would not have considered before.

Examination of liver disease, for example, is no longer limited to examining some general symptoms that all patients with liver disease share, but rather taking into account the individual's condition and its relationship with many variables that the mind cannot count without the mediation of the technological tool.

Thus, the treatment description will become an individual description, dependent on knowledge of data related to the individual's geographical and genetic origin, the environment in which he resides, his system of movement and nutrition, his blood type, the nature of his work and his human relations, and many other things that do not come to mind, which are more than a human mind can count.

This is the tip of the iceberg, in which an explanation of the nature of the research, scientific and practical horizon that technology has become to draw before the mind, as well as an explanation of the reason for the urgent need to think in a quantum computer faster than the current computer, and perhaps the need for this machine increases with the need to control one's life and form a structure the society.

Statistics of societal phenomena and understanding the relationships between individuals who do not stop filming what is happening around them and do not stop broadcasting it on social media, or in the new digital public space, has become dependent on the possession of high-speed technology, whether in gathering information or in processing it.

Thinking about developing the technological tool has become part of thinking about ways to be able to manage the political and security.

And it is known that digital public spaces have become teeming with millions of visual events and images that are not controlled by an officer and are not linked to a link, and it is also known that the mind has become bewildered before the infinite flow of images and viewers, it stands incapable of rationalizing what is happening in its visible world, aware of browsing and turning pictures;

So that if he wanted to represent the reality of a single historical moment through the displayed images, he would need to look with his eye at thousands of displays at once, which is impossible, and it remains above the energy of the naked eye.

However, what this eye is unable to do, does not incapacitate the technological eye, which has become begging for artificial intelligence to look, analyze and reason.

The owner of this technology is now able to tell you, before he turns back to you, about the commonalities between the aspects of visual reality and the differences between them.

For example, if he tells you that among the 100,000 videos broadcast this morning on YouTube, there are this or that amount of videos that were filmed in the bosom of nature, for example, or inside closed rooms, or he tells you about the common denominator between the activities of the video owners, and he classifies you Individuals according to their sports, artistic, sexual, etc. interests.

There is no doubt that the owner of this artificial intelligence and the most rapid technological tools is better able than others to read reality and know the resolve, feelings, and aspirations he is fighting in, and then he is more fortunate than others in controlling society and directing its dynamics.

The public space in its old sense is no longer the only source for knowing societal reality, or for feeling the pulse of the street, as it is said.

The technological means have been installed or nearly equipped on the public space linked to the geographical location, based on the authority of the majority.

It is now in the process of establishing the foundations of a hybrid space, depending on the movement of individuals, back and forth, between the virtual geographical and digital spaces.

It is not surprising that technology creates a new culture that breaks with the perceptions on which the prevailing culture is based.

The technological mind is no longer concerned with searching for a match between truth and reality, but rather concerned with creating and programming this reality.

After these examples of technological development and the increasing influence of the technological tool in managing the affairs of individuals and societies, we conclude with what should be known about the quantum computer that was the focus of the French President’s speech, and we recall that this computer is more than just a faster tool than its predecessors.

It is, in fact, an extension of a mind that breaks with the science of the traditional machine as a whole, because it is based on a principle other than the principle of the "raised third" by which we judge things either to be or not.

What stops us from the matter of the quantum computer, apart from the complex and incomprehensible physical details, is that it is a tool that begs to be made with new logic that is not based on seeing things in our visual world.

A logic based on what is provided by technological means in the world of the atom, where things escape from the grip of the logic of fixed identity, and enter into the development of complex identities (Superposition), according to which the thing is the same and others at the same time.

It is not surprising that technology creates a new culture that breaks with the perceptions on which the dominant culture is based.

The technological mind is no longer concerned with searching for a match between truth and reality, but rather concerned with creating and programming this reality.

Thus, technology does not stop at the point of exceeding the principles of the mind that has been looking with the naked eye, but has also made major challenges to the system of values ​​inherited from the cultural eras that precede the technological age.

Perhaps what is required to confront these challenges is, among other things, awareness of the nature of reality as it has become shaped in the technological age.

It does not help us to avert our eyes from this reality, as if it does not exist, so we judge it by old mental standards, or we cling to a cultural system that does not help in producing questions that the answers lead to an understanding of what is happening around us in terms of developments, such as continuing in our institutes and university institutions to ask a question of permissibility To work with Aristotelian logic, we repeat with the pacemaker, "and behind it is permissible to work with it on 3 sayings ...".

Carl Benedikt Frey, in his book The Trap of Technology, talks about the manifestations of damage that technological development throughout history has inflicted on some segments of society, especially in the short term;

He refers to a group of workers whose mission was to go up lighting poles to light the lamps that light the streets of New York before dark in the evening, and then switch them off before sunrise in the morning.

The skill of these workers was dispensed with immediately after supplying the city streets in 1914 with light bulbs that were activated with the simple press of a button, and they became unemployed overnight, out of history.

What is the situation of these workers similar to that of third-class societies that are unable to think of employing technology to impose themselves in today's world.

There are many barriers that prevent these societies from entering the technological age.

External objective contraindications, and other internal subjective contraindications.

Some of the internal intrinsic barriers are political related to the ruling authority’s reluctance to seek technological development for fear of losing hegemony, and also what is cultural related to old cultural structures that see in the new technology what strips it of its moral legitimacy, and some is economic related to the fear that the employment of new technology will lead To the loss of old job positions.

In conclusion, we say that whoever overlooks thought in today's world must be aware of the power and ability to control the fate of individuals and societies that have become the giants of technology.

This is not always satisfactory and admired by souls.

If technological development has aspects to be improved by, it has other aspects as well.

It is well known that awareness of all these aspects depends on the entry of the technological time, but individuals and societies no longer have the ability to enter this time as they want, but rather enter it as they are intended to enter.

This is for my life from the paradoxes that stop the mind and stimulate it to reflect on the question of the machine in its relationship with the questions of reason, culture and geostrategic, and the question of meaning in particular.