Most constitutional law experts believe that it is impossible to translate what the Democratic Party leaders and some Republicans are demanding that President Donald Trump be removed from office before the end of his term on the twentieth of this month.

Trump's attempts to calm fears after hundreds of his supporters stormed the Congress building during the election ratification session did not succeed, nor did his late admission that he lost the presidential election, and that his focus has become on an "orderly and smooth transfer of power," to assuage fears related to his behavior.

Trump's last surprise, which was released on Friday morning January 8, in tweets, on the Twitter platform before his account was banned, in which he indicated that the intruders, "patriots who voted for him," was a new shock, and this was followed by another tweet confirming that he will not attend the inauguration of President-elect Joe Biden .

Following the growing calls for his impeachment or his trial, here we show how the final chapter of Trump's presidency could end

The options seem limited in their impact, especially through the nature of the timetable necessary to remove Trump from office, which makes these scenarios difficult, if not impossible, during the remaining 11 days of his term.

There are two legal options for impeaching the president - the 25th amendment and dismissal - and an alternative scenario is through calls for US administration officials and military commanders not to follow presidential orders.

But the reality is more complex than those calls that some Republicans have joined, fearing the negative effects of Trump's continued judgment on the future of their political party.

Impossibility of the isolation scenario

Article 4 of the 25th Amendment to the Constitution permits the removal of a president who “cannot perform the powers and duties of his office,” however, it seems unlikely that this article will be invoked, as this would require the vice president, a majority of cabinet members, and two-thirds of Congress members to vote to remove The president is out of office.

And calls for House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and leader of the Senate, Democratic Senator Chuck Schumer, Vice President Mike Pence to resort to this option.

But this scenario will collide with Trump's rejection, and his challenge to him, as it appears that Mike Pence, Vice President, has no intention of moving forward with it.

Pelosi went to the leaders of the American army to confirm that the president's orders would not be implemented if he decided to launch a foreign war (Getty Images)

A trial will not be completed

The scenario of impeaching Trump through a parliamentary trial is a second alternative, and the House of Representatives can move quickly to submit impeachment materials and vote on them and send them to the Senate, and then the Senate will have to address them immediately as parliamentary trial cases take precedence over any other legislative work.

The problem here is that the Senate is in recess until January 19, one day before Biden is appointed as president.

During his press conference on Friday, Biden avoided touching on the desire of the leaders of his Democratic Party to impeach Trump, saying that impeachment was a "decision for Congress to take," adding that the "fastest" way to remove Trump from office is for him and the elected Vice President, Kamala Harris, to be sworn in to start work.

The Democrats ’desire to start Trump’s trial aims to prevent him from assuming any political position in the future, as the constitution stipulates that“ ruling in cases of removal may not extend beyond removal from office and ineligible to assume and enjoy any government position. ” Representatives try the president without a two-thirds majority in the Senate.

On the other hand, Republican Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina warned that "the damage that will happen if trying to isolate Trump will be great, and it will not succeed."

Not following the boss's orders

Faced with the difficulty of achieving the two previous scenarios, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Nancy Pelosi, turned to the leaders of the US Army to emphasize that the President’s orders would not be implemented if he decided to launch a foreign war.

"This morning I spoke with Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Mark Milley to discuss the precautions available to prevent an unstable president from starting military hostilities, accessing the nuclear portfolio and ordering a nuclear strike," Pelosi said in a press release on Friday.

This is not the first time that army commanders have been asked not to obey the president’s orders stipulated in the constitution.

In light of the Watergate crisis in the early 1970s, and before Congress went to try President Nixon (he resigned before it began), then Secretary of Defense Jim Schlesinger instructed the leaders of the American armies not to obey any presidential orders related to the use of nuclear weapons before returning to him and Secretary of State Henry Kissinger.

However, not following the orders of the President is considered an illegal act. However, some constitutional law experts believe that presidential orders can be rejected if they are unconstitutional, and this is subject to the surrounding political calculations and circumstances.