Referral of 3 young men to court for indecent assault on the public road

A partial civil court in Ras Al Khaimah has decided to suspend a lawsuit filed by a girl against three defendants of a (Gulf) nationality who were exposed to her by saying in a way that infringes her modesty on the public highway, until a final judgment is issued against one of the accused.

In detail, a girl of an (Arab) nationality filed a civil lawsuit in which she demanded that the three defendants pay her 50 thousand dirhams in compensation for the material damage she suffered, after the Criminal Court ruled that each accused be fined five thousand dirhams, for what was attributed to them of accusation.

The verdict was not accepted by the second and third defendants, which led them to appeal against it, and the court ruled to accept the appeal formally, and in the matter to reject it and confirm the appealed judgment, while the first defendant did not appeal the ruling, as he had not announced the judgment.

The case papers stated that the three defendants subjected the victim to insult, verbal harassment and verbal harassment, and harassed her and intercepted her in cars.

The case papers indicated that the victim had filed a communication against the defendants, stating that they heard it an inappropriate word on the public road, and that she had previously accused the second accused of having exposed her on the road, as he lived near her mother’s residence, and that the third accused shouted at her.

She added that one of the defendants was driving his vehicle, and the second accused stood inside the vehicle, pulled his head out of it, and shouted at her while she was driving her vehicle, echoing the phrase, (Hi Hai), with the intention of harassing her, and the third accused pounded her by greeting her in English.

A partial civil court affirmed in its verdict that it is decided in the Federal Supreme Court that the criminal judgment issued in the criminal case is authentic and that civil courts are bound by the cases that have not been decided by a final judgment, provided that the penal ruling is final.

She added that the convicted person must be confronted with the verdict or at his place of residence, so that he initiates an appeal against him by the opposition or the appeal or misses their appointments, and it becomes a final judgment.

She pointed out that the documents established that the judgment issued against the first accused in absentia was not implemented, and the papers were empty of his obtaining the declaration of the judgment or the appeal against it, and that the court established that the first accused did not announce the judgment in absentia, and then the judgment did not become final until he had the authority before The civil judiciary, and until the court is committed to what the judgment will end, and then the case must be suspended with him until the criminal case is decided by a final ruling for the first accused.

Follow our latest local and sports news, and the latest political and economic developments via Google news