He was injured in a traffic accident
Requiring an insurance company to compensate the "delivery" worker with 70,000 dirhams
The Ras Al Khaimah Court ordered an insurance company to compensate the "delivery" worker with an amount of 70,000 dirhams, after a driver who was insured with the company hit him, and caused him to break his left collarbone from his shoulder, and his inability to work in the field of order delivery.
In detail, an (Asian) worker was involved in a traffic accident caused by a (Gulf) driver insured with the defendant insurance company under an insurance policy, and the accident resulted in the plaintiff having a fracture in the middle of the left collarbone of the shoulder.
The Traffic Court indicted the vehicle driver criminally, for damaging a vehicle belonging to another in a traffic accident, and ramming his car into a motorcycle that the prosecutor was driving on Al-Jisr Street at the Civil Defense roundabout in Ras Al-Khaimah, which led to the destruction of the two vehicles and injuring the plaintiff, and the traffic report revealed that the cause of the accident was Failure of the accused to abide by his path.
The plaintiff filed a lawsuit with a full civilian, demanding that the defendant (the insurance company) be obligated to pay him the appropriate compensation, which the court estimates, and Al-Jaber for the physical, material and moral damages he suffered.
He explained in his lawsuit that he had suffered psychological, material and moral damage as a result of the accident, and incurred medical expenses and travel to his country for surgery, and that he would incur in the future the expenses of completing his treatment in his country, in addition to that he lost his salary, as a result of staying without work or wages for several months, pointing to He used to work as a motorcyclist in a cafeteria.
The agent who caused the accident submitted a memorandum, in which he demanded that the lawsuit be rejected because the damage was not achieved, and the claimant’s salary certificate was invalid, and he requested to address the Ministry of Labor to attach a copy of the plaintiff’s work contract.
The court affirmed, in its ruling, that what is established in the accident report is that the car, the instrument of the accident, is insured with compulsory civil liability insurance by third parties with the defendant insurance company, and then it is covered by insurance coverage, and the risk occurred from the insured, and then the insurance company’s liability paid Its commitment to compensate the injured, as estimated by the court.
The traffic report revealed that the cause of the accident was the defendant’s failure to abide by his path.
Follow our latest local and sports news, and the latest political and economic developments via Google news