Chinanews.com reported on December 25 that some local governments abused credit measures and included running traffic lights and misclassifying garbage as dishonest behavior.
Lian Weiliang, deputy director of the National Development and Reform Commission, said on the 25th that in the process of social governance in many places, especially when it is difficult to achieve governance through industry supervision, they hope to use credit measures.
However, local government regulatory documents or documents of local departments are used to make the above-mentioned system regulations, lacking the basis of the Party Central Committee and the State Council, lacking national or local-level legislation, and not fully considering the protection of the rights and interests of individuals or legal persons.
It does not meet the requirements of governing the country by law, nor does it meet the requirements of building a long-term mechanism for building integrity.
The State Council Information Office held a regular policy briefing of the State Council on the 25th. Deputy Director of the National Development and Reform Commission Lian Weiliang and Deputy Governor of the People’s Bank of China Chen Yulu introduced the situation regarding the improvement of the untrustworthy restraint system and the social credit system.
The reporter asked, how to define dishonest behavior?
How to prevent the abuse of dishonesty from expanding and generalizing?
Lian Weiliang made the above statement.
Lian Weiliang said that this time the "Guiding Opinions on Further Improving the Untrustworthy Restraint System and Building a Long-term Mechanism for Honesty Construction" is to solve the above problems in a certain sense.
In recent years, the Party Central Committee and the State Council have attached great importance to the construction of the social credit system and issued a series of laws, regulations and policy documents to promote the construction of the social credit system, which have achieved remarkable results, and the awareness of credit construction in the whole society has also been significantly enhanced.
Because of this, many social credit construction measures have played an increasingly important and greater role in social governance.
Lian Weiliang pointed out that based on the fact that these credit measures are becoming more and more useful and effective, many places in the process of social governance, especially when encountering some difficult problems to achieve governance through industry supervision, they hope to use For credit measures.
For example, include credit information records, put on a "blacklist" or implement joint punishment for dishonesty.
"But the problem is that some places only use local government normative documents or local department documents to make such system regulations. They lack the basis of the Party Central Committee and the State Council, lack the national or local level legislation, and do not fully consider individual or legal persons. "The protection of rights and interests," he said, "These measures not only do not meet the requirements of governing the country according to law, but also do not meet the requirements of building a long-term mechanism for building integrity."
Lian Weiliang pointed out that in order to solve these problems, the "Guiding Opinions" have made clear regulations, and the core content of the regulations is "one keyword and three specific measures."
"A key word" is to strictly comply with laws and regulations.
Standardize in accordance with laws and regulations, build in accordance with laws and regulations, and correct in accordance with laws and regulations.
That is to say, all the use of credit measures, including the inclusion of credit records, the "blacklist", or the implementation of joint punishments for untrustworthiness, must be based on documents from the Party Central Committee and the State Council, or be promulgated by institutions with legislative power at the national and local levels Laws and regulations as the basis.
The "three specific measures" are catalogues, checklists, and identification documents.
The so-called catalogue means that to include credit information records, it must be based on the catalogue, and a basic catalogue of public credit information must be formulated at the national level.
The list refers to the implementation of punishments for serious dishonesty or the implementation of inter-departmental joint disciplinary measures, which must be based on the list, and a basic list of punishment measures for dishonesty must be formulated at the national level.
The confirmation document means that if a market entity with serious untrustworthiness is to be included in the "blacklist", it must be based on the administrative law enforcement document of the law enforcement agency or a formal confirmation document issued on the basis of the law enforcement document.
Standardize the application of credit measures through hard measures such as catalogs, checklists, and identification documents, so that credit construction is truly brought into the track of rule of law.