The value of 34 tons of iron and scrap

The “Fujairah Appeals” acquitted two employees of the charge of embezzlement of 489 thousand dirhams

The Court of Appeal in Fujairah acquitted two employees, one European and the other Asian, of embezzlement charges of 34 tons of iron and scrap money, estimated at 489 thousand dirhams, owned by a private company in Fujairah, and harming the right holder.

In detail, the complainant submitted through the smart application a report stating that the defendants had committed breach of trust after they embezzled sums from the company, unjustly stole them, breach of trust, and breached their job, by seizing goods valued at 489 thousand dirhams.

The complainant claimed that the first accused cooperated with three other defendants, in agreement with another company for his personal benefit, and exploited the company's papers and seals, which caused serious damage to the right of the company, and seized the value of the scrap iron.

In his complaint, he indicated that the incident was revealed, after the company conducted an inventory of records and stores, and an advisory report was drawn up confirming this, adding - in the investigations of the Public Prosecution - that an accounting expert was appointed to examine the calculations that revealed the first defendant’s seizure of the sums amounting to 882 thousand And 770 dirhams for stealing the company’s bonds and seals.

When the first accused asked about the accusation against him, he denied it, saying: "I was working for the company as a supervisor, and I did not have the authority to buy and sell any of the company's items."

The defendant's defense attorney, Amna Al-Zaabi, presented the defenses, documents, and legal arguments in which she confirmed that the papers are free of evidence supporting the accused's commission of the crime attributed to him, referring to a basic rule that if the law had required punishment for the perpetrator of the sinful act, it also ensured the necessity of full certainty Who committed this act.

It confirmed that the case is free of any evidence of guilt against the accused, but an allegation, which is nothing more than sent statements that lack evidence, and lack the requirements of reason and logic, based on Article (211) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which states that “if the incident is not proven, or The law was not punishable, the court ruled innocence of the accused ».

And she continued: “The accused acknowledges and agrees with what was stated in the report of the delegated expertise, and the result he reached in that he had not proven to the experience with conclusive evidence and documents that he had received money from the complaining company, embezzled it for himself, or squandered it, or that he carried out acts that harm the interests of the company, or He concluded agreements containing conditions that prejudice the rights of the company, which was adopted by the court issuing the judgment after hearing the defense.

In her comment on the report of the accounting expert, she indicated that the report of the delegated expertise was clear and explicit and supported the arguments and evidence presented, and the accused acquitted of any accusation, demanding the verdict of innocence of the accused.

Follow our latest local and sports news, and the latest political and economic developments via Google news