About writing question

It became known to me that, every time, to the extent of my joy in completing a novel, I feel sad about the end of my career with her.

It also became known that the reason for this is one of the answers to the question that does not stop hovering around the book, once thrown at others, and once emanating from the writer himself, about the motive behind writing.

It is a question insofar as it is repeated, its answers vary and differ, not only from one writer to another;

But from the same person with every new fictional adventure.

This is because there are a priori causes that drive the act of writing, and a later one that results from it, and the motivation is to repeat the experience over and over again.

The writer feels sad about the emptiness of writing the novel;

Because by that, he would have passed a parallel life full of his ability to make and choose its details.

It is something that a person yearns for in his true life without being long.

In the novel, the writer’s parallel life, he is the only one controlling the destinies of the characters and events. He draws the path for them, paves him at times, and obstructs his paths at other times, leads them and leads them with his full will.

Because he knows the destination and destination, without losing his excitement.

It is that urgent need to get out, even once from his certain human weakness to the possibility that he is the owner of his command and decision.

There is a high value in the act of writing, because through it a person is renewed, as if every time he gets rid of his current version in thought, feeling and mood in favor of a more mature version, then he soon gets rid of this in favor of another, and so forth.

By embodying his thoughts and feelings on paper, he experiences the depth of himself, sees them in front of him, refinishes them, deletes matters and leaves others.

However, the novelist does not return from his book journey as he went, as he returns with a life experience that helps him to his reality.

That is because while he was experimenting with the many possibilities of his characters while he was not ceasing to complicate their destinies, he was enriched with a deeper understanding of how his ordinary life could go, how it could turn in a direction that was not desired, or stand idle to move forward.

Or at least if he does not grasp a deep understanding, then things are before him as if they happened before, and this is, without a doubt, less severe than if they came suddenly.

That is why the American poet, Terry William, was reported to be writing to reconcile with things that she cannot control.

Moreover, the writer, as the Saudi novelist Raja Alem said, chooses to write instead of life as he dreams .. It is a haven to confront disappointments, conquer them and defeat them .. It is the space that heals a person’s setbacks and violent defeats of life. Through writing, the writer equates the scale with his losses. Feeling unjust;

This is why writers do not stop repeating that writing is the most beautiful thing that happened to them, and that it is the only thing that they are good at doing.

In fact, the sentence is somewhat distorted, for writing is the only area in which the writer finds himself always victorious, over people and his disappointments, and even over himself.

And there is a high value in the act of writing, because through it a person is renewed, as if every time he gets rid of his current version of thought, feeling and mood in favor of a more mature version, then he soon gets rid of this in favor of another, and so forth.

By embodying his thoughts and feelings on paper, he experiences the depth of himself, sees them in front of him, refinishes them, deletes matters and leaves others.

But he is not always aware of his insides and in control of dealing with them, so writing reveals that to him, informing him of who he is, and how far away from his perceptions of himself.

Writing is a close mirror, not from the writer to others;

Rather from him and to him.

He does not tell people as much as he does it towards himself, which is why the American writer Joan Didion previously said, "I write entirely in order to know what I think, what I look at, what I see and what that means."

Perhaps this abundance of answers to one question indicates the extent to which writing may go to a person at a time when he thinks that he is going through a limited experience, and these answers are not necessarily in the person’s expectation, and here is undoubtedly another aspect of the permanent magic of writing.