Regarding the inclusion of the development of long-range cruise missiles in the new policy on missile prevention, the government should clarify the purpose and purpose so that it does not lead to the possession of "enemy base attack capability" from within the ruling party. Opinions have been expressed, and the government wants to explain it carefully and gain the understanding of the ruling party.
The government plans to decide a new policy on missile prevention next week, in addition to building two new Aegis ships as an alternative to the new interception missile system "Aegis Ashore", it can attack from outside the enemy's range. We will include the development of a long-range cruise missile "Stand Off Missile".
Specifically, he said, "It is necessary to effectively prevent attacks on Japan while ensuring the safety of SDF personnel," and greatly extended the range of the Ground Self-Defense Force's "Type 12 surface-to-ship guided ammunition" to escort ships. We plan to make it possible to fire from and fighter planes.
Regarding this, while there is an argument that the Liberal Democratic Party should have an in-depth discussion about possession of the ability to block ballistic missiles even within the opponent's territory, which was called "enemy base attack ability", the Komeito party said, "'Enemy. The purpose and purpose should be clarified so that it is not misunderstood as "base attack capability". "
The government carefully explained that it is not the purpose of possessing "enemy base attack capability", but that the expression "continue to consider strengthening deterrence" will be included in the cabinet decision regarding missile prevention capability within the opponent's territory. , I would like to get the understanding of the ruling party.