On the issue of "recruitment" during the Pacific War, a Korean court took the procedure of "public notice delivery" to publish the documents regarding the sale of the defendant's assets of Nippon Steel on the homepage, and the documents will be in Japan at midnight on the 9th. I considered it to have arrived on the side.
On the issue of "recruitment" during the Pacific War, the Supreme Court of South Korea quietly complained to defendant Nippon Steel & Sumitomo Metal and now Nippon Steel that it was "forced to work in Japan as a recruitment worker" 4 I handed down a judgment ordering people to compensate.
The Japanese government has requested the Korean government to correct the situation of violation of international law, saying that it has been settled based on the 1965 Japan-Korea Claims Agreement, and Nippon Steel has not responded to compensation.
In October, a Korean court took the procedure of "public notice delivery" to publish the documents regarding the sale of Nippon Steel's assets in South Korea on its website.
Then, two months later, at midnight on the 9th, it was considered that Nippon Steel had received a hearing requesting opinions on the sale of the assets.
Prior to this, a Korean court has also made a "public notice delivery" regarding the seizure of assets, and in August, Nippon Steel filed an "immediate appeal" requesting an injunction.
This time, it was considered that a hearing requesting opinions on the sale of assets had arrived, so the plaintiffs have advanced the procedure for "cashing", but the Korean media has more necessary procedures. , It is said that it will take some time before it is actually "cashed".